Difference between revisions of "Viewpoint Advocacy Groups"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Dzonatas Sol (talk | contribs) (change to reflect view in a non-political organization) |
Dzonatas Sol (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The core | The core goals of the AWG are as follows: | ||
* Integrate the requirements of each Viewpoint Advocacy Group. | * Integrate the requirements of each Viewpoint Advocacy Group. |
Revision as of 16:08, 11 October 2007
(This is an early draft document, created for feedback purposes. It does not reflect a consensus recommendation, or statement of policy at this this.)
Stakeholders in the Architecture have various agendas, goals, and viewpoints. These views are critical to the design of the new grid. This proposal is to create tasks to focus on specific requirements. The list of Viewpoint Advocacy Tasks may grow and shrink during the course of this project. The idea here is to provide a framework to address specific concerns in a systematic way.
The core goals of the AWG are as follows:
- Integrate the requirements of each Viewpoint Advocacy Group.
- Negotiate and document conflicts between viewpoints.
- Document rationale for architectural decisions.
- Produce a coherent architecture.
- Integrate feedback from the various viewpoint advocacy groups.
From there we work with each Viewpoint Advocacy Task, as follows:
- Document architectural views of the group.
- Document specific architectural requirements that stem from this view.
- Consider the architectural needs of specific likely implementations that fulfill the view's requirements.
- Operate in a way that allows for alternate implementations that satisfy the viewpoint.
- Work with the core goals to document views and requirements that conflict or are inconsistent.
- Review the core goals against the work output to ensure that the view's requirements are met.
List of VA-Groups
- Lorem
- Ipsum