Difference between revisions of "Talk:Second Life Railroad/SLRR History"
m (retracting comments) |
(Moving SLRR History 2010 and beond to new page. Origional page gotten to long to magange.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{talk}} | {{talk}} | ||
==Moving page== | |||
I have moved the [[Second_Life_Railroad/SLRR_History_2010|SLRR History from 2010 and beyond]] to this [[Second_Life_Railroad/SLRR_History_2010|new page]]. 2005 to 2009 can still be found at [[Second_Life_Railroad/SLRR_History]]. The old page gotten larger than the 32K maximum. --[[User:Stryker Jenkins|Stryker J]] 17:29, 2 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
== For simplicity's sake... == | == For simplicity's sake... == | ||
| Line 11: | Line 15: | ||
{{TorSig}} <font size="1">on 2010-09-01 @ 5:29 AM Pacific</font> | {{TorSig}} <font size="1">on 2010-09-01 @ 5:29 AM Pacific</font> | ||
<BR> | |||
Please see my response to torley linden on the main Second Life Railroad talk page [https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Talk:Second_Life_Railroad here].<BR> | Please see my response to torley linden on the main Second Life Railroad talk page [https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Talk:Second_Life_Railroad here].<BR> | ||
jer straaf<BR> | jer straaf<BR> | ||
Revision as of 10:29, 2 September 2010
Moving page
I have moved the SLRR History from 2010 and beyond to this new page. 2005 to 2009 can still be found at Second_Life_Railroad/SLRR_History. The old page gotten larger than the 32K maximum. --Stryker J 17:29, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
For simplicity's sake...
@Jer It isn't clear to me which specific passages you find objectionable. I won't assume and I don't have the luxury of time to look through all edits, so please quote and summarize with specific actionables. Otherwise, others have a hard time understanding what you mean.
Since there's a lot going on here, it may help to start fresh knowing that: alternate views can be presented within an article from each perspective. For example, "While Bob saw the burgeoning steampunk movement as important to e-commerce, Alice disagreed because it hurt her dieselpunk fashions. Complicating the matter further, John saw an opportunity to merge the two."
The point is, attribute these perspectives, and make it clear they aren't universally shared. Similar to how Wikipedia has both "positive", "negative", and "mixed" reviews cited in the "critical response" of movie reviews — Inception is a particularly weighty example.
- 
on 2010-09-01 @ 5:29 AM Pacific
Please see my response to torley linden on the main Second Life Railroad talk page here.
jer straaf
- retracting older comments --Stryker J 17:04, 2 September 2010 (UTC)