Difference between revisions of "User talk:Gigs Taggart/More efficient local cache"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(moved) |
(Feature question/suggestion) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* '''Comment:''' Seronis has some good ideas on how this should be implemented. [[User:SignpostMarv Martin|SignpostMarv Martin]] 07:51, 9 January 2007 (PST) | * '''Comment:''' Seronis has some good ideas on how this should be implemented. [[User:SignpostMarv Martin|SignpostMarv Martin]] 07:51, 9 January 2007 (PST) | ||
* '''Comment:''' Definitely. One cache per region, to a configurable cap total, would be an immense load off the asset servers, and off of our poor bandwidth. [[User:Buckaroo Mu|Buckaroo Mu]] 11:30, 9 January 2007 (PST) | * '''Comment:''' Definitely. One cache per region, to a configurable cap total, would be an immense load off the asset servers, and off of our poor bandwidth. [[User:Buckaroo Mu|Buckaroo Mu]] 11:30, 9 January 2007 (PST) | ||
== Feature question/suggestion == | |||
Would it be possible for the cache to "intelligently" check who owns a given region, and if the region is owned by the person logging in, the cache gives priority to that content, or it keeps it in a separate store ? | |||
[[User:SignpostMarv Martin|SignpostMarv Martin]] 06:40, 23 February 2007 (PST) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:40, 23 February 2007
- Comment: Seronis has some good ideas on how this should be implemented. SignpostMarv Martin 07:51, 9 January 2007 (PST)
- Comment: Definitely. One cache per region, to a configurable cap total, would be an immense load off the asset servers, and off of our poor bandwidth. Buckaroo Mu 11:30, 9 January 2007 (PST)
Feature question/suggestion
Would it be possible for the cache to "intelligently" check who owns a given region, and if the region is owned by the person logging in, the cache gives priority to that content, or it keeps it in a separate store ?
SignpostMarv Martin 06:40, 23 February 2007 (PST)