Difference between revisions of "Template talk:LSL Constants Attachment"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Just curious why ATTACH_RPEC and ATTACH_LPEC are shown as depreciated? ~~~~) |
(New section: Re: There is no zero attach point (undo by Strife)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Just curious why ATTACH_RPEC and ATTACH_LPEC are shown as depreciated? [[User:Arcane Clawtooth|Arcane Clawtooth]] 22:24, 15 January 2008 (PST) | Just curious why ATTACH_RPEC and ATTACH_LPEC are shown as depreciated? [[User:Arcane Clawtooth|Arcane Clawtooth]] 22:24, 15 January 2008 (PST) | ||
== Re: There is no zero attach point (undo by Strife) == | |||
Yes you are right, there is no zero attach point. Like I said, when using 0 (zero) as a parameter, the object will be attached to the '''most recent attach point'''. In other words, 0 (zero) is the functional equivalent of "Wear" in the user interface. | |||
Revision as of 14:04, 10 September 2008
Just curious why ATTACH_RPEC and ATTACH_LPEC are shown as depreciated? Arcane Clawtooth 22:24, 15 January 2008 (PST)
Re: There is no zero attach point (undo by Strife)
Yes you are right, there is no zero attach point. Like I said, when using 0 (zero) as a parameter, the object will be attached to the most recent attach point. In other words, 0 (zero) is the functional equivalent of "Wear" in the user interface.