Difference between revisions of "LSL Protocol/Restrained Life Relay/editorial changes"

From Second Life Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(splitted out of https://wiki.secondlife.com/w/index.php?title=LSL_Protocol/Restrained_Life_Relay/Bugs_and_Pendings_Features)
 
m
 
Line 4: Line 4:
This page is for discussion small changes to specification to make it easier to understand.
This page is for discussion small changes to specification to make it easier to understand.


== require preserve order or commands ==
== require preserve order of commands ==


PS: in the relay requirements, shouldn't we add that the commands must be executed in the same order as they are received? Without this assumption, a furniture maker can never be sure that the victim will be released in the end. --[[User:Satomi Ahn|Satomi Ahn]] 14:35, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
PS: in the relay requirements, shouldn't we add that the commands must be executed in the same order as they are received? Without this assumption, a furniture maker can never be sure that the victim will be released in the end. --[[User:Satomi Ahn|Satomi Ahn]] 14:35, 23 February 2009 (UTC)


: As it is required to work and a couple of relay implementers (including myself) missed it in their first try, it is worth to mention. --[[User:Maike Short|Maike Short]] 20:21, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
: As it is required to work and a couple of relay implementers (including myself) missed it in their first try, it is worth to mention. --[[User:Maike Short|Maike Short]] 20:21, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:56, 23 February 2009


This page is for discussion small changes to specification to make it easier to understand.

require preserve order of commands

PS: in the relay requirements, shouldn't we add that the commands must be executed in the same order as they are received? Without this assumption, a furniture maker can never be sure that the victim will be released in the end. --Satomi Ahn 14:35, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

As it is required to work and a couple of relay implementers (including myself) missed it in their first try, it is worth to mention. --Maike Short 20:21, 23 February 2009 (UTC)