Difference between revisions of "Mentor Q&A Discussion"

From Second Life Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 27: Line 27:
== Suggestion about FAQs ==
== Suggestion about FAQs ==
Might be a good idea to collect common questions and store them in an FAQ for new Mentors. [[User:Zai_Lynch/wmsk|Just started with a first draft]]. Feel free to add / change. --[[User:Zai Lynch|Zai Lynch]] 18:58, 16 January 2008 (PST)
Might be a good idea to collect common questions and store them in an FAQ for new Mentors. [[User:Zai_Lynch/wmsk|Just started with a first draft]]. Feel free to add / change. --[[User:Zai Lynch|Zai Lynch]] 18:58, 16 January 2008 (PST)
[[User:Jane2 McMahon|Jane2 McMahon]] 16:52, 1 February 2008 (PST)I like this channel better than the "official" one as a) there is room for discussion about issues that more than one person might find of value; and b) the unofficial SL mentor police don't clog up the channel complaining about people posting questions.  I've found the discussions quite good, and am pleased it does not descend into chattiness. -- Jane2

Revision as of 17:52, 1 February 2008

Please add your thoughts on the Mentor Q&A test group down below!

Please place your comment below the latest comment in this paragraph and sign it with four tildes ~~~~ (or the signature button Button sig.png). To write a direct response to one of the comments, move below that particular comment and start your entry with a colon. It will be displayed as an intended line then. Thank you :-) --Zai Lynch 02:10, 18 January 2008 (PST)


From ASCIIrider Hailey: Only thing I can point out is the 1:1 question/answer ratio. That only should apply with a complete or correct answer as some may give wrong info, thinking it's correct. —The preceding unsigned comment was added on 02:13, 17. Jan. 2008 by ASCIIrider Hailey


*Comment From Kitty Tandino* I think this is a good step foward.. A Q&A channel would be alot better then people spaming main channel "Mentors can join if they wish to help and those who don't want to don't have to" :D i will love to see where this all leads :D! Heres to one more Step foward!!!!!
WooT!
-Kitty —The preceding unsigned comment was added on 02:28, 17. Jan. 2008 by Kitty Tandino


I am invited to the group at 01/16/2008, and I hope that this group will be kept to the elite of the Mentors, so that Group Channel Spamming is kept to a minimum, and no-nonsense. I am pleased to be one of this group. Neovo —The preceding unsigned comment was added on 07:55, 17. Jan. 2008 by Neovo Geesink


I am slightly sceptic as to the impact of this on the general mentor population. Right now, I tend toward the position that anything less than a mandatory membership by mentors (or just turning the mentor channel into a q&a channel) will not be widespread enough to be effective; however, I'm keeping an open mind and the testing shall give more info. Also, a 1:1 ratio will not be effective; some answers will be wrong, others may require elaboration or explanation as to the why; without the reason *why* something is behaving the way it is, the q&a channel will miss its target of educating newer mentors. Will Webb 15:54, 21 January 2008 (PST)

Suggestion about FAQs

Might be a good idea to collect common questions and store them in an FAQ for new Mentors. Just started with a first draft. Feel free to add / change. --Zai Lynch 18:58, 16 January 2008 (PST)

Jane2 McMahon 16:52, 1 February 2008 (PST)I like this channel better than the "official" one as a) there is room for discussion about issues that more than one person might find of value; and b) the unofficial SL mentor police don't clog up the channel complaining about people posting questions. I've found the discussions quite good, and am pleased it does not descend into chattiness. -- Jane2