Difference between revisions of "No Limit Teleporter"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
BETLOG Hax (talk | contribs) m |
m (→Critique to the above script by BETLOG Hax: Missing apostrophe) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Simple Teleporter - No Limitation= | |||
Zero - Lag<br> | Zero - Lag<br> | ||
| Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
[+] Set stapos (end of script) to the object position (where to back when the destination is reach).<br> | [+] Set stapos (end of script) to the object position (where to back when the destination is reach).<br> | ||
[+] Set dest (end of script) to the object destination.<br> | [+] Set dest (end of script) to the object destination.<br> | ||
< | <syntaxhighlight lang="lsl2"> | ||
//Leave that here | //Leave that here | ||
//Script created by Morgam Biedermann | //Script created by Morgam Biedermann | ||
| Line 47: | Line 45: | ||
teleport(<141,19,505>); | teleport(<141,19,505>); | ||
} | } | ||
}</ | } | ||
</syntaxhighlight> | |||
== Critique to the above script by [[User:BETLOG Hax|BETLOG Hax]] == | |||
</ | |||
The above example is a really bad approach to use for many reasons. Not least of which is that lag is precisely what it ''will'' generate. | |||
< | |||
An equivalency check that respects SL's somewhat wiggly precision system, and isn't trying to match a movement to '''EXACTLY''' 6 decimal places of precision is needed.<br> | |||
<syntaxhighlight lang="lsl2"> | |||
if(llGetPos() != dest) | |||
//is bad | |||
</syntaxhighlight> | |||
<syntaxhighlight lang="lsl2"> | |||
if(llVecDist(llGetPos(),dest)<0.001) | |||
//is MUCH better | |||
</syntaxhighlight> | |||
ie: | |||
<syntaxhighlight lang="lsl2"> | |||
teleports(vector dest) | teleports(vector dest) | ||
{ | { | ||
| Line 59: | Line 68: | ||
// This an inherently bad approach; given 6 decimal places on 3 floats in a vector its | // This an inherently bad approach; given 6 decimal places on 3 floats in a vector its | ||
// very UNlikely the equivalency will be precisely equal even if its VERY close, this | // very UNlikely the equivalency will be precisely equal even if its VERY close, this | ||
// will become especially evident at high altitude. It'll look | // will become especially evident at high altitude. It'll look like its stopped, | ||
// but the llSetPos() will be still thrashing away. Possibly for quite some time/forever. | // but the llSetPos() will be still thrashing away. Possibly for quite some time/forever. | ||
// | // | ||
// the below will stop in a timely manner. | // the below will stop in a timely manner. | ||
if(llVecDist(llGetPos(),dest) <= 0. | if(llVecDist(llGetPos(),dest) <= 0.001) | ||
{ llSetPos(dest); //corrected variable | { llSetPos(dest); //corrected variable | ||
teleports(dest); //corrected variable | teleports(dest); //corrected variable | ||
} | } | ||
} | } | ||
</ | </syntaxhighlight> | ||
And a system that has a user function call itself from within itself is probably not good. | |||
This is '''MUCH''' better: ['''MUST''' be compiled in [[Mono|MONO]]] | |||
MUCH | <syntaxhighlight lang="lsl2"> | ||
< | |||
teleports(vector dest) | teleports(vector dest) | ||
{ list l=[PRIM_POSITION,dest]; | { list l=[PRIM_POSITION,dest]; | ||
| Line 78: | Line 86: | ||
llSetPrimitiveParams(l); | llSetPrimitiveParams(l); | ||
} | } | ||
</ | </syntaxhighlight> | ||
[[Category:LSL Examples]] | |||
Latest revision as of 10:22, 24 September 2022
Simple Teleporter - No Limitation
Zero - Lag
You can do anything, change the code and all more...
To use:
[+] Set stapos (end of script) to the object position (where to back when the destination is reach).
[+] Set dest (end of script) to the object destination.
//Leave that here
//Script created by Morgam Biedermann
vector posnow;
vector stapos;
rotation rotnow;
teleport(vector dest)
{
if(llGetPos() != dest)
{
llSetPos(dest);
teleport(dest);
}
else
{
llUnSit(llAvatarOnSitTarget());
teleports(stapos);
}
}
teleports(vector dest)
{
if(llGetPos() != stapos)
{
llSetPos(stapos);
teleports(stapos);
}
}
default
{
state_entry()
{
stapos = <141,19,30>;
}
touch_start(integer vez)
{
if(llDetectedKey(0) == llGetOwner())
teleport(<141,19,505>);
}
}
Critique to the above script by BETLOG Hax
The above example is a really bad approach to use for many reasons. Not least of which is that lag is precisely what it will generate.
An equivalency check that respects SL's somewhat wiggly precision system, and isn't trying to match a movement to EXACTLY 6 decimal places of precision is needed.
if(llGetPos() != dest)
//is bad
if(llVecDist(llGetPos(),dest)<0.001)
//is MUCH better
ie:
teleports(vector dest)
{
// if(llGetPos() != stapos)
// This an inherently bad approach; given 6 decimal places on 3 floats in a vector its
// very UNlikely the equivalency will be precisely equal even if its VERY close, this
// will become especially evident at high altitude. It'll look like its stopped,
// but the llSetPos() will be still thrashing away. Possibly for quite some time/forever.
//
// the below will stop in a timely manner.
if(llVecDist(llGetPos(),dest) <= 0.001)
{ llSetPos(dest); //corrected variable
teleports(dest); //corrected variable
}
}
And a system that has a user function call itself from within itself is probably not good. This is MUCH better: [MUST be compiled in MONO]
teleports(vector dest)
{ list l=[PRIM_POSITION,dest];
l+=l;l+=l;l+=l;l+=l;l+=l;l+=l;l+=l;l+=l;l+=l;
llSetPrimitiveParams(l);
}