Difference between revisions of "Talk:AWG Agent"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: * I'm not sure that glossary entries are a good use of the template mechanism. Because Agent is defined here, now we can't reformat the glossary entry for Agent because the formatting is ...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* I'm not sure that glossary entries are a good use of the template mechanism. Because Agent is defined here, now we can't reformat the glossary entry for Agent because the formatting is defined in the description in this template. And if anyone were to fix it here it would mess up other uses elsewhere. There probably isn't a solution to this, short of modifying MediaWiki code, so I guess I'll just copy your Description section out. Please revert if you find a better solution. --[[User:Morgaine Dinova|Morgaine Dinova]] 10:37, 20 October 2007 (PDT) | * I'm not sure that glossary entries are a good use of the template mechanism. Because Agent is defined here, now we can't reformat the glossary entry for Agent because the formatting is defined in the description in this template. And if anyone were to fix it here it would mess up other uses elsewhere. There probably isn't a solution to this, short of modifying MediaWiki code, so I guess I'll just copy your Description section out. Please revert if you find a better solution. --[[User:Morgaine Dinova|Morgaine Dinova]] 10:37, 20 October 2007 (PDT) | ||
:* I reverted my glossary edit and changed the template formatting instead. It's not ideal, but at least it avoids duplication. --[[User:Morgaine Dinova|Morgaine Dinova]] 10:47, 20 October 2007 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 10:47, 20 October 2007
- I'm not sure that glossary entries are a good use of the template mechanism. Because Agent is defined here, now we can't reformat the glossary entry for Agent because the formatting is defined in the description in this template. And if anyone were to fix it here it would mess up other uses elsewhere. There probably isn't a solution to this, short of modifying MediaWiki code, so I guess I'll just copy your Description section out. Please revert if you find a better solution. --Morgaine Dinova 10:37, 20 October 2007 (PDT)
- I reverted my glossary edit and changed the template formatting instead. It's not ideal, but at least it avoids duplication. --Morgaine Dinova 10:47, 20 October 2007 (PDT)