Difference between revisions of "Talk:Adult content keywords"

From Second Life Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Reinstated)
(Reinstated)
Line 17: Line 17:
  
 
Do you think we'll get away with putting a link to an offsite list of words? Or would that be considered taking the piss? - Elanthius Flagstaff
 
Do you think we'll get away with putting a link to an offsite list of words? Or would that be considered taking the piss? - Elanthius Flagstaff
 +
 +
:I'd consider this beeing the wrong way to deal with the issue. Although I don't agree with the reasoning behind the deletion, we should accept LL's authority of this wiki and respect their will, not to have this list available in this spot. Though I'd vote for bringing the issue up at [[User:Blondin Linden|Blondin]]'s office hour, rather than taking the step to link the list and risk a second deletion. [[Image:Zai_signature.png|45px]] '''[[User:Zai Lynch|Lynch]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Zai Lynch|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Zai Lynch|contribs]])</small></sup> 10:41, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:41, 29 April 2009

Essay.png This is a talk page. Please sign comments you leave here by putting four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comment. For more guidelines, see Talk Page Guidelines.

Thanks to Milla for adding a bunch more to the list. Could you note here what list of words you tested? It would make it easier to search if we know what's already been tried.—The preceding unsigned comment was added on 10:48, 27 April 2009 by DanielRavenNest Noe

Deletion

It was wrong to delete this list. It didn't violate the Editing Guidelines (only point I could imagine would be the PG paragraph tho I'd consider a list of keywords still PG as documantation rather than obscenity). Furthermore, it will prevent the contributors to contribute more content to any article because of the fear of irrecoverable removal. It only causes drama.

The reason given at thread 2407818 post 5987 isn't really a reason to remove this. False information can be fixed. If we'd decide to remove every article that contains partitially false or incomplete information, we wouldn't have much of a wiki anymore.

-- Zai signature.png Lynch (talk|contribs) 16:16, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

P.S.: Remove Search keywords too plz, since it's a dead redirect now. Zai signature.png Lynch (talk|contribs) 16:26, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Reinstated

Reinstated page without actual list. Also noted that search.secondlife.com is filtered too.—The preceding unsigned comment was added on 19:05, 28 April 2009 by DanielRavenNest Noe

Do you think we'll get away with putting a link to an offsite list of words? Or would that be considered taking the piss? - Elanthius Flagstaff

I'd consider this beeing the wrong way to deal with the issue. Although I don't agree with the reasoning behind the deletion, we should accept LL's authority of this wiki and respect their will, not to have this list available in this spot. Though I'd vote for bringing the issue up at Blondin's office hour, rather than taking the step to link the list and risk a second deletion. Zai signature.png Lynch (talk|contribs) 10:41, 29 April 2009 (UTC)