Difference between revisions of "Talk:Custom Linden Plants"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I'm interested. Would the Lindens create another type of ObjectExtraData (ala flexi) to store this? Currently, particle system data (the closest function to the proposed) is stored in a block inside the ObjectUpdate packet, and I think it's already pretty full. | I'm interested. Would the Lindens create another type of ObjectExtraData (ala flexi) to store this? Currently, particle system data (the closest function to the proposed) is stored in a block inside the ObjectUpdate packet, and I think it's already pretty full. | ||
''I would think it could be exclusive with llParticleSystem.'' -- [[User:Argent Stonecutter|Argent Stonecutter]] 13:24, 26 March 2007 (PDT) | ''I would think it could be exclusive with llParticleSystem. It could even be implemented for testing in the Open Source client by using a special texture for face 0 of a cube, and then re-assigning the llParticleSystem() parameters as llPlantSystem parameters.'' -- [[User:Argent Stonecutter|Argent Stonecutter]] 13:24, 26 March 2007 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:28, 26 March 2007
In jira as VWR-303 -- Argent Stonecutter 08:30, 26 March 2007 (PDT)
Interesting
I'm interested. Would the Lindens create another type of ObjectExtraData (ala flexi) to store this? Currently, particle system data (the closest function to the proposed) is stored in a block inside the ObjectUpdate packet, and I think it's already pretty full.
I would think it could be exclusive with llParticleSystem. It could even be implemented for testing in the Open Source client by using a special texture for face 0 of a cube, and then re-assigning the llParticleSystem() parameters as llPlantSystem parameters. -- Argent Stonecutter 13:24, 26 March 2007 (PDT)