Difference between revisions of "Talk:LSL Hacks"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I have added the <code>(List = []) + List</code> hack to the list, I don't recall why I didn't add it last time. Could you give a (better) example of what you mean, it's not immediately apparent. -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka|contribs]])</small></sup> 14:24, 13 August 2008 (PDT) | :I have added the <code>(List = []) + List</code> hack to the list, I don't recall why I didn't add it last time. Could you give a (better) example of what you mean, it's not immediately apparent. -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka|contribs]])</small></sup> 14:24, 13 August 2008 (PDT) | ||
Some people have claimed the (list=[]) is no longer necessary to speed up code. Is tris true? what about for strings? | |||
[[User:Contagious Republic|Contagious Republic]] 12:41, 31 March 2011 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 12:41, 31 March 2011
A friend said that the same (List != []) New + [] of addition elements trick can be used for string. Can someone verify that this memory hack works for strings? --Nexii Malthus 13:43, 13 August 2008 (PDT)
- I have added the
(List = []) + Listhack to the list, I don't recall why I didn't add it last time. Could you give a (better) example of what you mean, it's not immediately apparent. -- Strife (talk|contribs) 14:24, 13 August 2008 (PDT)
Some people have claimed the (list=[]) is no longer necessary to speed up code. Is tris true? what about for strings? Contagious Republic 12:41, 31 March 2011 (PDT)