Difference between revisions of "Talk:LSL Protocol/Restrained Love Open Relay Group/who"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Satomi Ahn (talk | contribs) (Replacing page with '==Old Discussion== Old discussion items can be found here. ==New Discussion== Before we replace all the !who by !x-who, I would sugg...') |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Before we replace all the !who by !x-who, I would suggest a better name (because well, if you hear who, the next question would be "Who's who?"). Why not be more explicit with a name like !x-operator? With such a way, it is obvious "who" we are talking about. Otherwise, one could interpret !who as the name of the owner, or that of the creator or who knows? | Before we replace all the !who by !x-who, I would suggest a better name (because well, if you hear who, the next question would be "Who's who?"). Why not be more explicit with a name like !x-operator? With such a way, it is obvious "who" we are talking about. Otherwise, one could interpret !who as the name of the owner, or that of the creator or who knows? | ||
--[[User:Satomi Ahn|Satomi Ahn]] 10:51, 12 June 2009 (UTC) | --[[User:Satomi Ahn|Satomi Ahn]] 10:51, 12 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
: We can do that, though I think that !who (!x-who) is sufficient in that it is "who is causing something to happen" - the creator and owner of the object I can already get from the object's UUID. The only thing I can't get is ''who'' is using the object. I prefer to keep this as !who, but if there is pressure for !x-operator I'll go along with it. --[[User:Chloe1982 Constantine|Chloe1982 Constantine]] 23:11, 28 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:11, 28 June 2009
Old Discussion
Old discussion items can be found here.
New Discussion
Before we replace all the !who by !x-who, I would suggest a better name (because well, if you hear who, the next question would be "Who's who?"). Why not be more explicit with a name like !x-operator? With such a way, it is obvious "who" we are talking about. Otherwise, one could interpret !who as the name of the owner, or that of the creator or who knows? --Satomi Ahn 10:51, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- We can do that, though I think that !who (!x-who) is sufficient in that it is "who is causing something to happen" - the creator and owner of the object I can already get from the object's UUID. The only thing I can't get is who is using the object. I prefer to keep this as !who, but if there is pressure for !x-operator I'll go along with it. --Chloe1982 Constantine 23:11, 28 June 2009 (UTC)