Difference between revisions of "Talk:LSL Protocol/Restrained Love Open Relay Group/who"

From Second Life Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Replacing page with '==Old Discussion== Old discussion items can be found here. ==New Discussion== Before we replace all the !who by !x-who, I would sugg...')
Line 5: Line 5:
 
Before we replace all the !who by !x-who, I would suggest a better name (because well, if you hear who, the next question would be "Who's who?"). Why not be more explicit with a name like !x-operator? With such a way, it is obvious "who" we are talking about. Otherwise, one could interpret !who as the name of the owner, or that of the creator or who knows?
 
Before we replace all the !who by !x-who, I would suggest a better name (because well, if you hear who, the next question would be "Who's who?"). Why not be more explicit with a name like !x-operator? With such a way, it is obvious "who" we are talking about. Otherwise, one could interpret !who as the name of the owner, or that of the creator or who knows?
 
--[[User:Satomi Ahn|Satomi Ahn]] 10:51, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Satomi Ahn|Satomi Ahn]] 10:51, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 +
: We can do that, though I think that !who (!x-who) is sufficient in that it is "who is causing something to happen" - the creator and owner of the object I can already get from the object's UUID. The only thing I can't get is ''who'' is using the object. I prefer to keep this as !who, but if there is pressure for !x-operator I'll go along with it. --[[User:Chloe1982 Constantine|Chloe1982 Constantine]] 23:11, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:11, 28 June 2009

Old Discussion

Old discussion items can be found here.

New Discussion

Before we replace all the !who by !x-who, I would suggest a better name (because well, if you hear who, the next question would be "Who's who?"). Why not be more explicit with a name like !x-operator? With such a way, it is obvious "who" we are talking about. Otherwise, one could interpret !who as the name of the owner, or that of the creator or who knows? --Satomi Ahn 10:51, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

We can do that, though I think that !who (!x-who) is sufficient in that it is "who is causing something to happen" - the creator and owner of the object I can already get from the object's UUID. The only thing I can't get is who is using the object. I prefer to keep this as !who, but if there is pressure for !x-operator I'll go along with it. --Chloe1982 Constantine 23:11, 28 June 2009 (UTC)