Difference between revisions of "Talk:LlAxes2Rot"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Starting to understand...) |
m (This text looks definitely broken to me) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* "All three vectors must be mutually orthogonal unit vectors." | * "All three vectors must be mutually orthogonal unit vectors." | ||
contradicts the "two non parallel vectors" assertion above which is much weaker. | contradicts the "two non-parallel vectors" assertion above which is much weaker. | ||
Or does this sentence refer to main text? In that case it should be moved upwards. | Or does this sentence refer to main text? In that case it should be moved upwards. | ||
-- Catherine Pfeffer | |||
* I also suggest to replace "non-parallel" with "non colinear" which is more correct mathematically. | |||
And perharps even with the stronger "orthogonal" requirement. | |||
-- Catherine Pfeffer | -- Catherine Pfeffer | ||
Revision as of 06:00, 6 April 2008
* "All three vectors must be mutually orthogonal unit vectors." contradicts the "two non-parallel vectors" assertion above which is much weaker. Or does this sentence refer to main text? In that case it should be moved upwards. -- Catherine Pfeffer
- I also suggest to replace "non-parallel" with "non colinear" which is more correct mathematically.
And perharps even with the stronger "orthogonal" requirement. -- Catherine Pfeffer