Difference between revisions of "Talk:LlAxes2Rot"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Oops) |
m (Grrr) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* "All three vectors must be mutually orthogonal unit vectors." contradicts the "two non-parallel vectors" assertion above which is much weaker. Or does this sentence refer to main text? In that case it should be moved upwards, to a | * "All three vectors must be mutually orthogonal unit vectors." contradicts the "two non-parallel vectors" assertion above which is much weaker. Or does this sentence refer to main text? In that case it should be moved upwards, to a func_footnote. -- Catherine Pfeffer | ||
* I also suggest to replace "non-parallel" with "non colinear" which is more correct mathematically. And perharps even with the stronger "orthogonal" requirement.-- Catherine Pfeffer | * I also suggest to replace "non-parallel" with "non colinear" which is more correct mathematically. And perharps even with the stronger "orthogonal" requirement.-- Catherine Pfeffer | ||
Revision as of 06:09, 6 April 2008
- "All three vectors must be mutually orthogonal unit vectors." contradicts the "two non-parallel vectors" assertion above which is much weaker. Or does this sentence refer to main text? In that case it should be moved upwards, to a func_footnote. -- Catherine Pfeffer
- I also suggest to replace "non-parallel" with "non colinear" which is more correct mathematically. And perharps even with the stronger "orthogonal" requirement.-- Catherine Pfeffer