Difference between revisions of "Talk:LlFrand"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Unclear note: *unsigned*) |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
What does mean "the process" in "The sequence of random numbers are shared across the entire process" in Notes. Should one expect it is SIM, object or script "wide" ?{{unsigned|Scarabeus Kurka|18:38, 22 September 2008}} | What does mean "the process" in "The sequence of random numbers are shared across the entire process" in Notes. Should one expect it is SIM, object or script "wide" ?{{unsigned|Scarabeus Kurka|18:38, 22 September 2008}} | ||
:By "process" they mean the entire sim. -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka|contribs]])</small></sup> 07:42, 23 September 2008 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 07:42, 23 September 2008
Known Issues
1.13.3 specifying mag < 0 always returns 0.
- ummm thats not good. I was rather fond of the old method. Why not use the copysign function found in "math.h" after stripping the sign to put it back on? (C99 revisions of glibc will support it aka, won't be in windows but will be in any recent version of linux GCC). Something like:
include <math.h>
float llFrand(float range)
{
return copysign(new_method(fabsf(range), range);
}
- QED Strife Onizuka 18:45, 31 January 2007 (PST)
The issue has already been corrected in the code, unit tested, through QA, and awaiting the next rolling update. Phoenix Linden 08:47, 2 February 2007 (PST)
Unclear note
What does mean "the process" in "The sequence of random numbers are shared across the entire process" in Notes. Should one expect it is SIM, object or script "wide" ?—The preceding unsigned comment was added on 18:38, 22 September 2008 by Scarabeus Kurka