Difference between revisions of "Talk:LlList2CSV"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: >> Strife says: This function transforms the data, there is no expectation of modification, so the caveat isn't needed, though it is on other string and list function articles. I've been m...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
>> Strife says: This function transforms the data, there is no expectation of modification, so the caveat isn't needed, though it is on other string and list function articles. I've been meaning to make a template.) | >> Strife says: This function transforms the data, there is no expectation of modification, so the caveat isn't needed, though it is on other string and list function articles. I've been meaning to make a template.) | ||
I would propose that for learners, who can make this mistake as I did many times when exhausted in the battle to learn LSL, that a caveat is useful, and that it does no harm for those who don't need it, as they can just ignore it? Part of my aim is to make the advice / language accessible to learners. [[User:Chaz Longstaff|Chaz Longstaff]] 17:36, 14 July 2008 (PDT) | I would propose that for learners, who can make this mistake as I did many times when exhausted in the battle to learn LSL, that a caveat is useful, and that it does no harm for those who don't need it, as they can just ignore it? Part of my aim is to make the advice / language accessible to learners. As well, as you point out, it would be inconsistent not to have it here, as it is other similar places?[[User:Chaz Longstaff|Chaz Longstaff]] 17:36, 14 July 2008 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:36, 14 July 2008
>> Strife says: This function transforms the data, there is no expectation of modification, so the caveat isn't needed, though it is on other string and list function articles. I've been meaning to make a template.)
I would propose that for learners, who can make this mistake as I did many times when exhausted in the battle to learn LSL, that a caveat is useful, and that it does no harm for those who don't need it, as they can just ignore it? Part of my aim is to make the advice / language accessible to learners. As well, as you point out, it would be inconsistent not to have it here, as it is other similar places?Chaz Longstaff 17:36, 14 July 2008 (PDT)