Difference between revisions of "Talk:Quality Assurance VAG"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
=List of concerns addressed by this viewpoint= | =List of concerns addressed by this viewpoint= | ||
* The implementation of these VAGs need their own viewpoint and views (not the suggested views/viewpoints from the VAG itself); however, the concerns listed on the VAG page have not been addressed. That already sets a bad example for any future views. The design and model of these VAGs just have not been completed because concerns have been ignored. [[User:Dzonatas Sol|Dzonatas Sol]] 07:43, 18 October 2007 (PDT) | * The implementation of these VAGs need their own viewpoint and views (not the suggested views/viewpoints from the VAG itself); however, the concerns listed on the VAG page have not been addressed. That already sets a bad example for any future views. The design and model of these VAGs just have not been completed because concerns have been ignored. [[User:Dzonatas Sol|Dzonatas Sol]] 07:43, 18 October 2007 (PDT) | ||
:* Transplanted from the main namespace, where it's clearly off topic since it is not a concern within this viewpoint. It's a good point, but made in the wrong place. I'm thinking of copying it into the parent of this main namespace too, ie. about VAGs themselves. --[[User:Morgaine Dinova|Morgaine Dinova]] 13:33, 18 October 2007 (PDT) | |||
=Areas not addressed by this viewpoint= | =Areas not addressed by this viewpoint= |
Revision as of 13:33, 18 October 2007
Purpose
List of concerns addressed by this viewpoint
- The implementation of these VAGs need their own viewpoint and views (not the suggested views/viewpoints from the VAG itself); however, the concerns listed on the VAG page have not been addressed. That already sets a bad example for any future views. The design and model of these VAGs just have not been completed because concerns have been ignored. Dzonatas Sol 07:43, 18 October 2007 (PDT)
- Transplanted from the main namespace, where it's clearly off topic since it is not a concern within this viewpoint. It's a good point, but made in the wrong place. I'm thinking of copying it into the parent of this main namespace too, ie. about VAGs themselves. --Morgaine Dinova 13:33, 18 October 2007 (PDT)