Talk:Second Life Community Standards

From Second Life Wiki
Revision as of 07:11, 27 April 2010 by Mako Nozaki (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

If art like Venus de Milo, is mature according to this standards I think that this have to be made more clear. So problems like the once surrounding the Burning Man exhibition don't happens again. Personally i don't think it's a great idea to move the PG rating that far away from RL in second life. All residents are supposed to be mature. What the limits are is extremely important when considering getting land. As my stuff could get deleted and the land worthless if i do wrong for a project. --Nadine Nozaki 23:58, 30 August 2007 (PDT)

The problem with clearly defining what is mature content is forgetting something. Although there is the fall-back rule of "broadly offensive content", forgetting something that should be classed as mature content gives asshats a loophole.
See the draft policy for SL5B for my take on what constitutes mature content.
SignpostMarv Martin 20:22, 2 September 2007 (PDT)

I agree that clarifying can be hard, but now we see some signs that Restrictes is mature in movies and mature in SL is PG-13 in movies. In some way there is a great need to know before you get banned what the rules are.

--Nadine Nozaki 09:24, 23 September 2007 (PDT)

Why "duplicate" ?

On the official page (http://secondlife.com/corporate/cs.php), there are full accurate contents of Big 6. Why there is a copy here? I propose to delete the contents on this page and simply put the link to official Big 6. --Mako 15:11, 27 April 2010 (UTC)