Difference between revisions of "Talk:Snowglobe Development Process"
Rob Linden (talk | contribs) (reply to Mm) |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Wow. I thought the Wiki ate my changes. My heart sank think about having to do it all over. Then I read your comment and my heart sank even further. [[User:Mm Alder|Mm Alder]] 19:37, 10 May 2009 (UTC) | Wow. I thought the Wiki ate my changes. My heart sank think about having to do it all over. Then I read your comment and my heart sank even further. [[User:Mm Alder|Mm Alder]] 19:37, 10 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I hate to be a curmudgeon, but I'm not going to have the time right now to go through what you wrote with a fine-toothed comb. I'll make an effort to incorporate the non-controversial parts of what you wrote this coming week, and have a discussion about the controversial parts. The gist: let's not make ''this page'' yet another venue to flog Linden Lab for what you think we're doing wrong. -- [[User:Rob Linden|Rob Linden]] 19:53, 10 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:53, 10 May 2009
Writing credits
This document, as of this writing, represents a merge of some work started at Mm Alder at User:Mm Alder/SLDev Open Source Viewer, Q Linden at SLDev Open Source Viewer, and various authors (in the history) at HTTP Texture Development. -- Rob Linden 19:02, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
commit privileges
That's the process for folks with commit privileges. Need to clarify what people without those privileges need to do to submit a patch. Merov Linden 01:06, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
link to SVN
I linked to http://svn.secondlife.com/trac/linden/browser/projects/2009/http-texture (forgot to write it in the comment)
Mm's version
Note to Mm Alder: your version has a long narrative that isn't exactly necessary for newcomers, and certainly is not putting our best foot forward in building a community. More after the weekend. -- Rob Linden 19:14, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Wow. I thought the Wiki ate my changes. My heart sank think about having to do it all over. Then I read your comment and my heart sank even further. Mm Alder 19:37, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- I hate to be a curmudgeon, but I'm not going to have the time right now to go through what you wrote with a fine-toothed comb. I'll make an effort to incorporate the non-controversial parts of what you wrote this coming week, and have a discussion about the controversial parts. The gist: let's not make this page yet another venue to flog Linden Lab for what you think we're doing wrong. -- Rob Linden 19:53, 10 May 2009 (UTC)