Difference between revisions of "Talk:Snowglobe Development Process"
(→link to SVN: new section) |
Rob Linden (talk | contribs) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Writing credits == | |||
This document, as of this writing, represents a merge of some work started at [[User:Mm Alder|Mm Alder]] at [[User:Mm Alder/SLDev Open Source Viewer]], [[User:Q Linden|Q Linden]] at [[SLDev Open Source Viewer]], Merov Linden [https://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/2009-April/013608.html on the SLDev mailing list] and various authors (in the history) at [[HTTP Texture Development]]. -- [[User:Rob Linden|Rob Linden]] 19:02, 6 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
== commit privileges == | |||
That's the process for folks with commit privileges. Need to clarify what people without those privileges need to do to submit a patch. [[User:Merov Linden|Merov Linden]] 01:06, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | That's the process for folks with commit privileges. Need to clarify what people without those privileges need to do to submit a patch. [[User:Merov Linden|Merov Linden]] 01:06, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| Line 5: | Line 10: | ||
I linked to http://svn.secondlife.com/trac/linden/browser/projects/2009/http-texture (forgot to write it in the comment) | I linked to http://svn.secondlife.com/trac/linden/browser/projects/2009/http-texture (forgot to write it in the comment) | ||
== Mm's version == | |||
Note to Mm Alder: your version has a long narrative that isn't exactly necessary for newcomers, and certainly is not putting our best foot forward in building a community. More after the weekend. -- [[User:Rob Linden|Rob Linden]] 19:14, 10 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Wow. I thought the Wiki ate my changes. My heart sank think about having to do it all over. Then I read your comment and my heart sank even further. [[User:Mm Alder|Mm Alder]] 19:37, 10 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
:I hate to be a curmudgeon, but I'm not going to have the time right now to go through what you wrote with a fine-toothed comb. I'll make an effort to incorporate the non-controversial parts of what you wrote this coming week, and have a discussion about the controversial parts. The gist: let's not make ''this page'' yet another venue to flog Linden Lab for what you think we're doing wrong. -- [[User:Rob Linden|Rob Linden]] 19:53, 10 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Discussion next week is fine. My intention was quite the opposite: to show that Linden recognized some problems and is trying to make things better. I didn't put this much effort into documenting the new effort in order to discourage it. I think it's great! [[User:Mm Alder|Mm Alder]] 20:06, 10 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:09, 18 May 2009
Writing credits
This document, as of this writing, represents a merge of some work started at Mm Alder at User:Mm Alder/SLDev Open Source Viewer, Q Linden at SLDev Open Source Viewer, Merov Linden on the SLDev mailing list and various authors (in the history) at HTTP Texture Development. -- Rob Linden 19:02, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
commit privileges
That's the process for folks with commit privileges. Need to clarify what people without those privileges need to do to submit a patch. Merov Linden 01:06, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
link to SVN
I linked to http://svn.secondlife.com/trac/linden/browser/projects/2009/http-texture (forgot to write it in the comment)
Mm's version
Note to Mm Alder: your version has a long narrative that isn't exactly necessary for newcomers, and certainly is not putting our best foot forward in building a community. More after the weekend. -- Rob Linden 19:14, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Wow. I thought the Wiki ate my changes. My heart sank think about having to do it all over. Then I read your comment and my heart sank even further. Mm Alder 19:37, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- I hate to be a curmudgeon, but I'm not going to have the time right now to go through what you wrote with a fine-toothed comb. I'll make an effort to incorporate the non-controversial parts of what you wrote this coming week, and have a discussion about the controversial parts. The gist: let's not make this page yet another venue to flog Linden Lab for what you think we're doing wrong. -- Rob Linden 19:53, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Discussion next week is fine. My intention was quite the opposite: to show that Linden recognized some problems and is trying to make things better. I didn't put this much effort into documenting the new effort in order to discourage it. I think it's great! Mm Alder 20:06, 10 May 2009 (UTC)