Difference between revisions of "Template talk:LSL Constants Attachment"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New section: Re: There is no zero attach point (undo by Strife)) |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Yes you are right, there is no zero attach point. Like I said, when using 0 (zero) as a parameter, the object will be attached to the '''most recent attach point'''. In other words, 0 (zero) is the functional equivalent of "Wear" in the user interface. | Yes you are right, there is no zero attach point. Like I said, when using 0 (zero) as a parameter, the object will be attached to the '''most recent attach point'''. In other words, 0 (zero) is the functional equivalent of "Wear" in the user interface. | ||
--[[User:Runay Roussel|Runay Roussel]] 14:30, 10 September 2008 (PDT) |
Revision as of 14:30, 10 September 2008
Just curious why ATTACH_RPEC and ATTACH_LPEC are shown as depreciated? Arcane Clawtooth 22:24, 15 January 2008 (PST)
Re: There is no zero attach point (undo by Strife)
Yes you are right, there is no zero attach point. Like I said, when using 0 (zero) as a parameter, the object will be attached to the most recent attach point. In other words, 0 (zero) is the functional equivalent of "Wear" in the user interface. --Runay Roussel 14:30, 10 September 2008 (PDT)