Difference between revisions of "Template talk:LSL Constants Attachment"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Yes you are right, there is no zero attach point. Like I said, when using 0 (zero) as a parameter, the object will be attached to the '''most recent attach point'''. In other words, 0 (zero) is the functional equivalent of "Wear" in the user interface. | Yes you are right, there is no zero attach point. Like I said, when using 0 (zero) as a parameter, the object will be attached to the '''most recent attach point'''. In other words, 0 (zero) is the functional equivalent of "Wear" in the user interface. | ||
--[[User:Runay Roussel|Runay Roussel]] 14:30, 10 September 2008 (PDT) | --[[User:Runay Roussel|Runay Roussel]] 14:30, 10 September 2008 (PDT) | ||
: ooooh... that makes sense. That should be in the function notes for [[llAttachToAvatar]] not in this table (which is shared with [[llGetAttached]]). I'll make it so. -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka|contribs]])</small></sup> 14:40, 10 September 2008 (PDT) | |||
== Re: ATTACH_RPEC and ATTACH_LPEC == | == Re: ATTACH_RPEC and ATTACH_LPEC == | ||
Revision as of 14:40, 10 September 2008
Just curious why ATTACH_RPEC and ATTACH_LPEC are shown as depreciated? Arcane Clawtooth 22:24, 15 January 2008 (PST)
Re: There is no zero attach point (undo by Strife)
Yes you are right, there is no zero attach point. Like I said, when using 0 (zero) as a parameter, the object will be attached to the most recent attach point. In other words, 0 (zero) is the functional equivalent of "Wear" in the user interface. --Runay Roussel 14:30, 10 September 2008 (PDT)
- ooooh... that makes sense. That should be in the function notes for llAttachToAvatar not in this table (which is shared with llGetAttached). I'll make it so. -- Strife (talk|contribs) 14:40, 10 September 2008 (PDT)
Re: ATTACH_RPEC and ATTACH_LPEC
I was wondering about that myself, so I tried it out of curiosity. It still works, but left and right are reversed. --Runay Roussel 14:39, 10 September 2008 (PDT)