Difference between revisions of "User talk:Glaznah Gassner"

From Second Life Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 5: Line 5:


Agree, the alphabetical ordering is what readers expect to see. Putting the fresh items on top is worse than alphabetical idea usually, as just started tools are often useless.
Agree, the alphabetical ordering is what readers expect to see. Putting the fresh items on top is worse than alphabetical idea usually, as just started tools are often useless.
[[User:Glaznah Gassner|Dino Fabrell, SL Business Directory - http://www.slbiz2life.com]] 11:44, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:44, 8 December 2009

Business Tools Sorting order

An alphabetical sorting order makes much more sense to me, since sorting the list by date of entry on the wikipage is counter intuitive. There is precedence of alphabetical ordering in other portions of the Wiki as well, not to mention that alphabetical is the order of choice in Wikipedia too. When it comes to ordering by submission, the most useful ordering would actually to put freshly added items to the TOP of the list, so reader who refers to a page frequently does not need to scroll a lot but sees recent additions right away. Both sorting of course have the disadvantage that your own entry will not be at the top anymore. But while it is commendable that you contributed to the list, intuitive usefulness to the reader should be the main goal. Thanks! --Peter Stindberg 11:36, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Agree, the alphabetical ordering is what readers expect to see. Putting the fresh items on top is worse than alphabetical idea usually, as just started tools are often useless. Dino Fabrell, SL Business Directory - http://www.slbiz2life.com 11:44, 8 December 2009 (UTC)