<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.secondlife.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Janita+Collins</id>
	<title>Second Life Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.secondlife.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Janita+Collins"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/Janita_Collins"/>
	<updated>2026-06-28T11:18:37Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.42.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.secondlife.com/w/index.php?title=Nesting_of_Child_Prims_in_a_Parent&amp;diff=40253</id>
		<title>Nesting of Child Prims in a Parent</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.secondlife.com/w/index.php?title=Nesting_of_Child_Prims_in_a_Parent&amp;diff=40253"/>
		<updated>2007-11-13T12:19:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Janita Collins: /* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Idea / Feature request&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== &#039;&#039;&#039;Idea / Feature request&#039;&#039;&#039;: ==&lt;br /&gt;
Possibility to use &#039;&#039;&#039;NESTED Parent/Child Prims&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If in the current SL edition we link child prims to a parent, we cannot keep a linked child set together.&lt;br /&gt;
Say I want to build a car, and the steering wheel is built like a unit of 3 linked prims.&lt;br /&gt;
When I now want to link the steering wheel to the car, the &#039;unit&#039; &amp;quot;steering wheel&amp;quot; gets lost, and ends up as 3 separate prims.&lt;br /&gt;
So if I would like to replace the steering wheel, by unlinking the car, I end up with 3 separate childs, instead of 1 steering wheel prim.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If it would be possible to add &#039;nested&#039; child prims this problem would be solved.&lt;br /&gt;
The structure of a linked set then could/should behave more like a TREE, rather than the current &#039;linear&#039; structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe we need new functions for this, to be able to discern the level of &amp;quot;nested-ness&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Example: Say we have this structure:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 PARENT (link #1) = &lt;br /&gt;
  { ROOTPRIM + &lt;br /&gt;
    CHILD 1 (link #2) = PARENT OF: { CHILD 1a (link #3) + CHILD 1b (link #4)}&lt;br /&gt;
    CHILD 2 (link #5) = PARENT OF: { CHILD 2a (link #6) + CHILD 2b (link #7)}&lt;br /&gt;
  }&lt;br /&gt;
Now suppose we want to edit CHILD 2, because CHILD 2b should be replaced by a new prim.&lt;br /&gt;
In the current situation this means: CTRL+SHIFT-L (unlink complete set)&lt;br /&gt;
but now also all childs from CHILD 1 get un-linked too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Ideally&#039;&#039;&#039;, it would be most convenient if when we unlink the ROOT PARENT PRIM we would get to the next linked levels.&lt;br /&gt;
So in the example above: ideally UN-linking the PARENT would give us : PARENT, CHILD 1, CHILD 2, where we can go further by UN-linking e.g. CHILD 2 into 2a and 2b by repeating our UNLINK session. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please consider this idea and give it your thoughts!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regards,&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Tjako Schumann|Tjako Schumann]] 05:03, 26 September 2007 (PDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would just like to second this suggestion - the current system of &amp;quot;total unlinking&amp;quot; is really a problem when assembling pre-built parts. Janita Collins&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Janita Collins</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>