Second Life Wiki - User contributions [en]

Talk:Adult content keywords

2009-05-06T12:53:14Z

Tormented Twilight: /* Deletion */

{{talk}}
Thanks to Milla for adding a bunch more to the list. Could you note here what list of words you tested? It would make it easier to search if we know what's already been tried.{{unsigned|DanielRavenNest Noe|10:48, 27 April 2009}}

== Deletion ==

It was wrong to delete this list. It didn't violate the [[Editing Guidelines]] (only point I could imagine would be the PG paragraph tho I'd consider a list of keywords still PG as documantation rather than obscenity). Furthermore, it will prevent the contributors to contribute more content to ''any'' article because of the fear of irrecoverable removal. It only causes drama.

The reason given at [http://forums.secondlife.com/showpost.php?p=2407818&postcount=5987 thread 2407818 post 5987] isn't really a reason to remove this. False information can be fixed. If we'd decide to remove every article that contains partitially false or incomplete information, we wouldn't have much of a wiki anymore.

-- [[Image:Zai_signature.png|45px]] '''[[User:Zai Lynch|Lynch]]''' ([[User talk:Zai Lynch|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Zai Lynch|contribs]]) 16:16, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

:<strike>P.S.: Remove [[Search keywords]] too plz, since it's a dead redirect now. [[Image:Zai_signature.png|45px]] '''[[User:Zai Lynch|Lynch]]''' ([[User talk:Zai Lynch|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Zai Lynch|contribs]]) 16:26, 28 April 2009 (UTC)</strike>

I for one think they were right in deleting the list of keywords that you can't use in SL, in a pg sim, or pg parcel description. Like they said there were some incorrect keywords in there. Instead of going through them all and fixing the list it was just better to delete it altogether. If Residents don't want to get warned, temp-banned, perma-banned or worse(?) they should take it upon themselves to know the keywords you're not allowed to use in PG sims. But, that's up to them to figure out. If they posted the list of keywords that you can't use without getting into trouble for using them, then people would find someway to game the search system by not using them. I'm sure that in time they'll post an official list of all the adult keywords you're not allowed to use. I'd say until then if you don't want to get in trouble for using the wrong keywords, don't use any keywords. Better safe than sorry!
[[User:Tormented Twilight|Tormented Twilight]] 01:49, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

== Reinstated ==

Reinstated page without actual list. Also noted that search.secondlife.com is filtered too.{{unsigned|DanielRavenNest Noe|19:05, 28 April 2009}}

Do you think we'll get away with putting a link to an offsite list of words? Or would that be considered taking the piss? - Elanthius Flagstaff

:I'd consider this beeing the wrong way to deal with the issue. Although I don't agree with the reasoning behind the deletion, we should accept LL's authority of this wiki and respect their will, not to have this list available in this spot. Though I'd vote for bringing the issue up at [[User:Blondin Linden|Blondin]]'s office hour, rather than taking the step to link the list and risk a second deletion. [[Image:Zai_signature.png|45px]] '''[[User:Zai Lynch|Lynch]]''' ([[User talk:Zai Lynch|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Zai Lynch|contribs]]) 10:41, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Adult content keywords

2009-05-06T01:49:55Z

Tormented Twilight: /* Deletion */

{{talk}}
Thanks to Milla for adding a bunch more to the list. Could you note here what list of words you tested? It would make it easier to search if we know what's already been tried.{{unsigned|DanielRavenNest Noe|10:48, 27 April 2009}}

== Deletion ==

It was wrong to delete this list. It didn't violate the [[Editing Guidelines]] (only point I could imagine would be the PG paragraph tho I'd consider a list of keywords still PG as documantation rather than obscenity). Furthermore, it will prevent the contributors to contribute more content to ''any'' article because of the fear of irrecoverable removal. It only causes drama.

The reason given at [http://forums.secondlife.com/showpost.php?p=2407818&postcount=5987 thread 2407818 post 5987] isn't really a reason to remove this. False information can be fixed. If we'd decide to remove every article that contains partitially false or incomplete information, we wouldn't have much of a wiki anymore.

-- [[Image:Zai_signature.png|45px]] '''[[User:Zai Lynch|Lynch]]''' ([[User talk:Zai Lynch|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Zai Lynch|contribs]]) 16:16, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

:<strike>P.S.: Remove [[Search keywords]] too plz, since it's a dead redirect now. [[Image:Zai_signature.png|45px]] '''[[User:Zai Lynch|Lynch]]''' ([[User talk:Zai Lynch|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Zai Lynch|contribs]]) 16:26, 28 April 2009 (UTC)</strike>

I for one think they were right in deleting the list of keywords that you can't use in SL, in a pg sim, or pg parcel description. Like they said there were some incorrect keywords in there. Instead of going through them all and fixing the list it was just better to delete it altogether. If Residents don't want to get warned, temp-banned, perma-banned or worse(?) they should take it upon themselves to know the keywords you're not allowed to use in PG sims. But, that's up to them to figure out. If they posted the list of keywords that you can't use without getting into trouble for using them, then people would find someway to game the search system by not using them. I'm sure that in time they'll post an official list of all the adult keywords you're not allowed to use.
[[User:Tormented Twilight|Tormented Twilight]] 01:49, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

== Reinstated ==

Reinstated page without actual list. Also noted that search.secondlife.com is filtered too.{{unsigned|DanielRavenNest Noe|19:05, 28 April 2009}}

Do you think we'll get away with putting a link to an offsite list of words? Or would that be considered taking the piss? - Elanthius Flagstaff

:I'd consider this beeing the wrong way to deal with the issue. Although I don't agree with the reasoning behind the deletion, we should accept LL's authority of this wiki and respect their will, not to have this list available in this spot. Though I'd vote for bringing the issue up at [[User:Blondin Linden|Blondin]]'s office hour, rather than taking the step to link the list and risk a second deletion. [[Image:Zai_signature.png|45px]] '''[[User:Zai Lynch|Lynch]]''' ([[User talk:Zai Lynch|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Zai Lynch|contribs]]) 10:41, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Adult content keywords

2009-05-06T01:49:23Z

Tormented Twilight: /* Deletion */

{{talk}}
Thanks to Milla for adding a bunch more to the list. Could you note here what list of words you tested? It would make it easier to search if we know what's already been tried.{{unsigned|DanielRavenNest Noe|10:48, 27 April 2009}}

== Deletion ==

It was wrong to delete this list. It didn't violate the [[Editing Guidelines]] (only point I could imagine would be the PG paragraph tho I'd consider a list of keywords still PG as documantation rather than obscenity). Furthermore, it will prevent the contributors to contribute more content to ''any'' article because of the fear of irrecoverable removal. It only causes drama.

The reason given at [http://forums.secondlife.com/showpost.php?p=2407818&postcount=5987 thread 2407818 post 5987] isn't really a reason to remove this. False information can be fixed. If we'd decide to remove every article that contains partitially false or incomplete information, we wouldn't have much of a wiki anymore.

-- [[Image:Zai_signature.png|45px]] '''[[User:Zai Lynch|Lynch]]''' ([[User talk:Zai Lynch|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Zai Lynch|contribs]]) 16:16, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

:<strike>P.S.: Remove [[Search keywords]] too plz, since it's a dead redirect now. [[Image:Zai_signature.png|45px]] '''[[User:Zai Lynch|Lynch]]''' ([[User talk:Zai Lynch|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Zai Lynch|contribs]]) 16:26, 28 April 2009 (UTC)</strike>

[[User:Tormented Twilight|Tormented Twilight]] 01:49, 6 May 2009 (UTC) I for one think they were right in deleting the list of keywords that you can't use in SL, in a pg sim, or pg parcel description. Like they said there were some incorrect keywords in there. Instead of going through them all and fixing the list it was just better to delete it altogether. If Residents don't want to get warned, temp-banned, perma-banned or worse(?) they should take it upon themselves to know the keywords you're not allowed to use in PG sims. But, that's up to them to figure out. If they posted the list of keywords that you can't use without getting into trouble for using them, then people would find someway to game the search system by not using them. I'm sure that in time they'll post an official list of all the adult keywords you're not allowed to use. [[User:Tormented Twilight|Tormented Twilight]] 01:49, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

== Reinstated ==

Reinstated page without actual list. Also noted that search.secondlife.com is filtered too.{{unsigned|DanielRavenNest Noe|19:05, 28 April 2009}}

Do you think we'll get away with putting a link to an offsite list of words? Or would that be considered taking the piss? - Elanthius Flagstaff

:I'd consider this beeing the wrong way to deal with the issue. Although I don't agree with the reasoning behind the deletion, we should accept LL's authority of this wiki and respect their will, not to have this list available in this spot. Though I'd vote for bringing the issue up at [[User:Blondin Linden|Blondin]]'s office hour, rather than taking the step to link the list and risk a second deletion. [[Image:Zai_signature.png|45px]] '''[[User:Zai Lynch|Lynch]]''' ([[User talk:Zai Lynch|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Zai Lynch|contribs]]) 10:41, 29 April 2009 (UTC)