Category talk:LSL Integer - Revision history

Miranda Umino: /* check if a string contains valid integers */

2012-09-27T10:59:43Z

check if a string contains valid integers

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:59, 27 September 2012
Line 54:		Line 54:
	}		}
	</lsl>		</lsl>
			I don t know why the main page hints to check each number inside a list . It seems very inneficient

Miranda Umino: /* check if a string contains valid integers */

2012-09-27T10:57:00Z

check if a string contains valid integers

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:57, 27 September 2012
Line 43:		Line 43:

	:Both methods fail on a signed positive integer ("+1234"), but this seems to be way more efficient. If you do put it into the main page, it'd probably be best to do so as a function. [[User:Pete Olihenge\|Pete Olihenge]] 08:30, 1 November 2011 (PDT)		:Both methods fail on a signed positive integer ("+1234"), but this seems to be way more efficient. If you do put it into the main page, it'd probably be best to do so as a function. [[User:Pete Olihenge\|Pete Olihenge]] 08:30, 1 November 2011 (PDT)

			Try this :

			<lsl>
			integer IsInteger(string myInteger)
			{
			integer i = (integer)myInteger;
			string temp = (string)i;
			return (temp == myInteger)\|\|( "+" + temp == myInteger);
			}
			</lsl>

Pete Olihenge: /* check if a string contains valid integers */

2011-11-01T15:30:35Z

check if a string contains valid integers

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:30, 1 November 2011
Line 41:		Line 41:
	}		}
	[[User:Avi Savira\|Avi Savira]] 17:06, 30 October 2011 (PDT)		[[User:Avi Savira\|Avi Savira]] 17:06, 30 October 2011 (PDT)

			:Both methods fail on a signed positive integer ("+1234"), but this seems to be way more efficient. If you do put it into the main page, it'd probably be best to do so as a function. [[User:Pete Olihenge\|Pete Olihenge]] 08:30, 1 November 2011 (PDT)

Avi Savira: /* check if a string contains valid integers */

2011-11-01T14:23:05Z

check if a string contains valid integers

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:23, 1 November 2011
Line 36:		Line 36:
	The following would also check that, but I've never yet added anything to this wiki, so added this here for comments		The following would also check that, but I've never yet added anything to this wiki, so added this here for comments

	if ((string)((integer)(input)) == input ~~&& input != ""~~)		if ((string)((integer)(input)) == input)
	{		{
	llSay(0, "The input contains only valid integers");		llSay(0, "The input contains only valid integers");
	}		}
	[[User:Avi Savira\|Avi Savira]] 17:06, 30 October 2011 (PDT)		[[User:Avi Savira\|Avi Savira]] 17:06, 30 October 2011 (PDT)

Avi Savira: /* check if a string contains valid integers */

2011-11-01T14:22:30Z

check if a string contains valid integers

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:22, 1 November 2011
Line 36:		Line 36:
	The following would also check that, but I've never yet added anything to this wiki, so added this here for comments		The following would also check that, but I've never yet added anything to this wiki, so added this here for comments

	if ((string)((integer)(input)) == input)		if ((string)((integer)(input)) == input && input != "")
	{		{
	llSay(0, "The input contains only valid integers");		llSay(0, "The input contains only valid integers");
	}		}
	[[User:Avi Savira\|Avi Savira]] 17:06, 30 October 2011 (PDT)		[[User:Avi Savira\|Avi Savira]] 17:06, 30 October 2011 (PDT)

Avi Savira: /* check if a string contains valid integers */ new section

2011-10-31T00:06:32Z

check if a string contains valid integers: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:06, 30 October 2011
Line 30:		Line 30:

	:::We operate on the same ideals as Wikipedia and similar guidelines. So without further ado I'll point you to a Wikipedia article that answers your question better than I can. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BB Wikipedia:Be bold] -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka\|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka\|contribs]])</small></sup> 14:50, 26 January 2010 (UTC)		:::We operate on the same ideals as Wikipedia and similar guidelines. So without further ado I'll point you to a Wikipedia article that answers your question better than I can. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BB Wikipedia:Be bold] -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka\|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka\|contribs]])</small></sup> 14:50, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

			== check if a string contains valid integers ==

			The category tab shows a function to determine whether a string of characters consists only of integers.
			The following would also check that, but I've never yet added anything to this wiki, so added this here for comments

			if ((string)((integer)(input)) == input)
			{
			llSay(0, "The input contains only valid integers");
			}
			[[User:Avi Savira\|Avi Savira]] 17:06, 30 October 2011 (PDT)

Strife Onizuka: /* Editing this wiki */

2010-01-26T14:50:36Z

Editing this wiki

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:50, 26 January 2010
Line 27:		Line 27:
	: Hi Pete, it is always OK to make the wiki better! We are all editors. It is good to have a thick hide here, stand your ground and have your facts on file if you are challenged ;) --[[User:Cerise Sorbet\|Cerise Sorbet]] 13:49, 26 January 2010 (UTC)		: Hi Pete, it is always OK to make the wiki better! We are all editors. It is good to have a thick hide here, stand your ground and have your facts on file if you are challenged ;) --[[User:Cerise Sorbet\|Cerise Sorbet]] 13:49, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
	::Thanks Cerise. It is done, and I have my tin foil hat at the ready :) [[User:Pete Olihenge\|Pete Olihenge]] 13:57, 26 January 2010 (UTC)		::Thanks Cerise. It is done, and I have my tin foil hat at the ready :) [[User:Pete Olihenge\|Pete Olihenge]] 13:57, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
			:::Looks better already. Don't worry about making mistakes, we all make them, and we will all help fix them. As it turns out, since I've been a major contributer of content, a good portion of the mistakes you will be fixing were mine. Sure I take pride in my work, but I take more pride in ensuring that the wiki is the best it can be; whether my contributions stand or fall is of no matter as long as things improve. Contributions can take on several forms, especially after editing: It can be what is written on the page, the ideas on the page but not there form, the form but not the ideas, the layout, the interconnections, the corrections, the usability. None of us control the destiny of the content we contribute, we control not the final form.

			:::We operate on the same ideals as Wikipedia and similar guidelines. So without further ado I'll point you to a Wikipedia article that answers your question better than I can. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BB Wikipedia:Be bold] -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka\|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka\|contribs]])</small></sup> 14:50, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Pete Olihenge: /* Editing this wiki */

2010-01-26T13:57:49Z

Editing this wiki

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:57, 26 January 2010
Line 26:		Line 26:
	The first sentence on this page reads "An integer data types are signed 32 bit values [...]"; I think this should read "The integer data type is a signed 32 bit value [...]". Is it ok for me to make relatively minor gramatical corrections to errors like this without consultation, or should I flag my suggestion here first? [[User:Pete Olihenge\|Pete Olihenge]] 12:19, 26 January 2010 (UTC)		The first sentence on this page reads "An integer data types are signed 32 bit values [...]"; I think this should read "The integer data type is a signed 32 bit value [...]". Is it ok for me to make relatively minor gramatical corrections to errors like this without consultation, or should I flag my suggestion here first? [[User:Pete Olihenge\|Pete Olihenge]] 12:19, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
	: Hi Pete, it is always OK to make the wiki better! We are all editors. It is good to have a thick hide here, stand your ground and have your facts on file if you are challenged ;) --[[User:Cerise Sorbet\|Cerise Sorbet]] 13:49, 26 January 2010 (UTC)		: Hi Pete, it is always OK to make the wiki better! We are all editors. It is good to have a thick hide here, stand your ground and have your facts on file if you are challenged ;) --[[User:Cerise Sorbet\|Cerise Sorbet]] 13:49, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
			::Thanks Cerise. It is done, and I have my tin foil hat at the ready :) [[User:Pete Olihenge\|Pete Olihenge]] 13:57, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Cerise Sorbet: /* Editing this wiki */

2010-01-26T13:49:15Z

Editing this wiki

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:49, 26 January 2010
Line 25:		Line 25:

	The first sentence on this page reads "An integer data types are signed 32 bit values [...]"; I think this should read "The integer data type is a signed 32 bit value [...]". Is it ok for me to make relatively minor gramatical corrections to errors like this without consultation, or should I flag my suggestion here first? [[User:Pete Olihenge\|Pete Olihenge]] 12:19, 26 January 2010 (UTC)		The first sentence on this page reads "An integer data types are signed 32 bit values [...]"; I think this should read "The integer data type is a signed 32 bit value [...]". Is it ok for me to make relatively minor gramatical corrections to errors like this without consultation, or should I flag my suggestion here first? [[User:Pete Olihenge\|Pete Olihenge]] 12:19, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
			: Hi Pete, it is always OK to make the wiki better! We are all editors. It is good to have a thick hide here, stand your ground and have your facts on file if you are challenged ;) --[[User:Cerise Sorbet\|Cerise Sorbet]] 13:49, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Pete Olihenge: /* Editing this wiki */ new section

2010-01-26T12:19:06Z

Editing this wiki: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:19, 26 January 2010
Line 21:		Line 21:

	: [[LSL_101/LSL_in_Focus:_Integers\|LSL in Focus: Integers]] classifies how integers are used in LSL, and might be what you are looking for. The uses are: signed integers, truth values, enumerations and bit vectors. I think every LSL integer constant clearly falls in exactly one of these four categories.--[[User:Omei Turnbull\|Omei Turnbull]] 03:28, 8 January 2010 (UTC)		: [[LSL_101/LSL_in_Focus:_Integers\|LSL in Focus: Integers]] classifies how integers are used in LSL, and might be what you are looking for. The uses are: signed integers, truth values, enumerations and bit vectors. I think every LSL integer constant clearly falls in exactly one of these four categories.--[[User:Omei Turnbull\|Omei Turnbull]] 03:28, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

			== Editing this wiki ==

			The first sentence on this page reads "An integer data types are signed 32 bit values [...]"; I think this should read "The integer data type is a signed 32 bit value [...]". Is it ok for me to make relatively minor gramatical corrections to errors like this without consultation, or should I flag my suggestion here first? [[User:Pete Olihenge\|Pete Olihenge]] 12:19, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:57, 26 January 2010
Line 26:		Line 26:
	The first sentence on this page reads "An integer data types are signed 32 bit values [...]"; I think this should read "The integer data type is a signed 32 bit value [...]". Is it ok for me to make relatively minor gramatical corrections to errors like this without consultation, or should I flag my suggestion here first? [[User:Pete Olihenge\|Pete Olihenge]] 12:19, 26 January 2010 (UTC)		The first sentence on this page reads "An integer data types are signed 32 bit values [...]"; I think this should read "The integer data type is a signed 32 bit value [...]". Is it ok for me to make relatively minor gramatical corrections to errors like this without consultation, or should I flag my suggestion here first? [[User:Pete Olihenge\|Pete Olihenge]] 12:19, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
	: Hi Pete, it is always OK to make the wiki better! We are all editors. It is good to have a thick hide here, stand your ground and have your facts on file if you are challenged ;) --[[User:Cerise Sorbet\|Cerise Sorbet]] 13:49, 26 January 2010 (UTC)		: Hi Pete, it is always OK to make the wiki better! We are all editors. It is good to have a thick hide here, stand your ground and have your facts on file if you are challenged ;) --[[User:Cerise Sorbet\|Cerise Sorbet]] 13:49, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
			::Thanks Cerise. It is done, and I have my tin foil hat at the ready :) [[User:Pete Olihenge\|Pete Olihenge]] 13:57, 26 January 2010 (UTC)