Talk:Adult Content User Group - Revision history

Nalates Urriah: /* Adding to Agenda */ name

2011-07-26T00:08:18Z

Adding to Agenda: name

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:08, 25 July 2011
Line 21:		Line 21:

	Also, we seem to have a mission statement in the Agenda. Shouldn't it be moved to its own heading?		Also, we seem to have a mission statement in the Agenda. Shouldn't it be moved to its own heading?

			Nalates Urriah 7/25/2011

Nalates Urriah: Add topic

2011-07-26T00:06:34Z

Add topic

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:06, 25 July 2011
Line 16:		Line 16:
	Since we proved, last week, that there is a work-round, how about (as was suggested) mentioning this on the Adult Content User Group Page, if no where else?		Since we proved, last week, that there is a work-round, how about (as was suggested) mentioning this on the Adult Content User Group Page, if no where else?
	[[User:Byatis Resident\|Byatis Resident]] 06:22, 9 May 2011 (PDT)		[[User:Byatis Resident\|Byatis Resident]] 06:22, 9 May 2011 (PDT)

			=== Adding to Agenda ===
			The table is pretty. But, it makes it hard for non-wiki types to add agenda items. Can we go with a simple agenda like most of the other User Groups?

			Also, we seem to have a mission statement in the Agenda. Shouldn't it be moved to its own heading?

Byatis Resident at 13:22, 9 May 2011

2011-05-09T13:22:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:22, 9 May 2011
Line 12:		Line 12:

	[[User:Serjourn Daxter\|Serjourn Daxter]] 23:58, 9 February 2011 (PST)		[[User:Serjourn Daxter\|Serjourn Daxter]] 23:58, 9 February 2011 (PST)

			=== New Users Can't Edit the Wiki ===
			Since we proved, last week, that there is a work-round, how about (as was suggested) mentioning this on the Adult Content User Group Page, if no where else?
			[[User:Byatis Resident\|Byatis Resident]] 06:22, 9 May 2011 (PDT)

Serjourn Daxter: /* Non-Zindra Adult sims */

2011-02-10T08:03:59Z

Non-Zindra Adult sims

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:03, 10 February 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:
	1. Zindra is all adult. The "islanders" may have very different issues from the Zindra ones. Will the representation be a united one - or are you planning to have separate representation of Zindra/non Zindra in this forum?		1. Zindra is all adult. The "islanders" may have very different issues from the Zindra ones. Will the representation be a united one - or are you planning to have separate representation of Zindra/non Zindra in this forum?

	2. Lately I have on one occation seem my self and on several occations been told of child avatars teleporting (3-7 of them) into adult sims, taking pictures (I have no idea of what) and leaving, all within 3-5 minutes. On other occations, they have teleported in, stayed, done nothing, until they have been asked to leave. Now I may be paranoid here. But I smell the stench of organized provocations. How should we deal with these situations? Keep in mind that some of the child protection organizations define "abuse pictures" (they try to avoid using the term child pornography) as "any picture of children in "sexually tense" situations with adults, weather clothed or not, cartoon like or real pictures". A "scrapbook" full of such pictures can do ~~SecondLIfe~~ a lot of damage if ever published, even if the real persons behind the avatars are all adult. Can we please at least discuss a change to the TOS saying something like: "Child avatars, child like avatars and avatars that will likely be percieved as being under the age of 18, have no access to any sims rated Adult unless they change their appearance to look adult"?		2. Lately I have on one occation seem my self and on several occations been told of child avatars teleporting (3-7 of them) into adult sims, taking pictures (I have no idea of what) and leaving, all within 3-5 minutes. On other occations, they have teleported in, stayed, done nothing, until they have been asked to leave. Now I may be paranoid here. But I smell the stench of organized provocations. How should we deal with these situations? Keep in mind that some of the child protection organizations define "abuse pictures" (they try to avoid using the term child pornography) as "any picture of children in "sexually tense" situations with adults, weather clothed or not, cartoon like or real pictures". A "scrapbook" full of such pictures can do SecondLife a lot of damage if ever published, even if the real persons behind the avatars are all adult. Can we please at least discuss a change to the TOS saying something like: "Child avatars, child like avatars and avatars that will likely be percieved as being under the age of 18, have no access to any sims rated Adult unless they change their appearance to look adult"?

	Now I will leave this as a start. Hope I will be able to be online this Monday.		Now I will leave this as a start. Hope I will be able to be online this Monday.

	~~Serjourn Daxter~~
	[[User:Serjourn Daxter\|Serjourn Daxter]] 23:58, 9 February 2011 (PST)		[[User:Serjourn Daxter\|Serjourn Daxter]] 23:58, 9 February 2011 (PST)

Serjourn Daxter: Non-Zindra Adult sims

2011-02-10T07:58:05Z

Non-Zindra Adult sims

New page

== Non-Zindra Adult sims ==

Thank you clarifying and improving the communication channels. I have been waiting a long time for this. What remains to be seen is if the channels have any real influence, but I will sure give it a good try!

There are two "adult lands" - Zindra and "the rest". I dismissed Zindra entirely for my purposes, created a mini continent and have all my activity (save for a few minor land patches) on private islands. To me it seems like Zindra and "the rest" have sometimes opposing interests, and face widely different problems. At the same time, the Zindra based sims have the "advantage of the numbers" in terms of being heard. Now to some specific questions:

1. Zindra is all adult. The "islanders" may have very different issues from the Zindra ones. Will the representation be a united one - or are you planning to have separate representation of Zindra/non Zindra in this forum?

2. Lately I have on one occation seem my self and on several occations been told of child avatars teleporting (3-7 of them) into adult sims, taking pictures (I have no idea of what) and leaving, all within 3-5 minutes. On other occations, they have teleported in, stayed, done nothing, until they have been asked to leave. Now I may be paranoid here. But I smell the stench of organized provocations. How should we deal with these situations? Keep in mind that some of the child protection organizations define "abuse pictures" (they try to avoid using the term child pornography) as "any picture of children in "sexually tense" situations with adults, weather clothed or not, cartoon like or real pictures". A "scrapbook" full of such pictures can do SecondLIfe a lot of damage if ever published, even if the real persons behind the avatars are all adult. Can we please at least discuss a change to the TOS saying something like: "Child avatars, child like avatars and avatars that will likely be percieved as being under the age of 18, have no access to any sims rated Adult unless they change their appearance to look adult"?

Now I will leave this as a start. Hope I will be able to be online this Monday.

Serjourn Daxter
[[User:Serjourn Daxter|Serjourn Daxter]] 23:58, 9 February 2011 (PST)