Talk:Grid Identifiers Spec - Revision history

Cenji Neutra at 03:11, 11 June 2008

2008-06-11T03:11:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:11, 10 June 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:

	Based on feedback received thus far from various parties, including comments on sldev, for the 2nd draft we're considering switching the notation to a URN scheme. We may even expand the scope of the proposal to include lookup of a resolver service.		Based on feedback received thus far from various parties, including comments on sldev, for the 2nd draft we're considering switching the notation to a URN scheme. We may even expand the scope of the proposal to include lookup of a resolver service.
	Although beyond the scope of the spec, more ~~though~~ may be given to how a resolver service might be implemented. One possibility would be the use of DNS with NAPTR and SRV records, or something similar to [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3401 DDDS]. See [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2915 RFC2915] - [[User:Cenji Neutra\|Cenji Neutra]] 19:29, 10 June 2008 (PDT)		Although beyond the scope of the spec, more thought may be given to how a resolver service might be implemented. One possibility would be the use of DNS with NAPTR and SRV records, or something similar to [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3401 DDDS]. See [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2915 RFC2915] - [[User:Cenji Neutra\|Cenji Neutra]] 19:29, 10 June 2008 (PDT)

Cenji Neutra at 02:33, 11 June 2008

2008-06-11T02:33:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:33, 10 June 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:

	Based on feedback received thus far from various parties, including comments on sldev, for the 2nd draft we're considering switching the notation to a URN scheme. We may even expand the scope of the proposal to include lookup of a resolver service.		Based on feedback received thus far from various parties, including comments on sldev, for the 2nd draft we're considering switching the notation to a URN scheme. We may even expand the scope of the proposal to include lookup of a resolver service.
	Although beyond the scope of the spec, more though may be given to how a resolver service might be implemented. One possibility would be the use of DNS with NAPTR and SRV records, or something similar to [http://tools.ietf.org/html/~~rfc2915~~ DDDS]. See [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2915 RFC2915] - [[User:Cenji Neutra\|Cenji Neutra]] 19:29, 10 June 2008 (PDT)		Although beyond the scope of the spec, more though may be given to how a resolver service might be implemented. One possibility would be the use of DNS with NAPTR and SRV records, or something similar to [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3401 DDDS]. See [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2915 RFC2915] - [[User:Cenji Neutra\|Cenji Neutra]] 19:29, 10 June 2008 (PDT)

Cenji Neutra at 02:29, 11 June 2008

2008-06-11T02:29:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:29, 10 June 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:

	(please end each comment with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, which will be substituted with your name and the date-time)		(please end each comment with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, which will be substituted with your name and the date-time)


			Based on feedback received thus far from various parties, including comments on sldev, for the 2nd draft we're considering switching the notation to a URN scheme. We may even expand the scope of the proposal to include lookup of a resolver service.
			Although beyond the scope of the spec, more though may be given to how a resolver service might be implemented. One possibility would be the use of DNS with NAPTR and SRV records, or something similar to [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2915 DDDS]. See [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2915 RFC2915] - [[User:Cenji Neutra\|Cenji Neutra]] 19:29, 10 June 2008 (PDT)

Cenji Neutra: New page: Open Grid Identifier Notation discussion page. (please end each comment with ~~~~, which will be substituted with your name and the date-time)

2008-06-10T15:52:41Z

New page: Open Grid Identifier Notation discussion page. (please end each comment with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, which will be substituted with your name and the date-time)

New page

Open Grid Identifier Notation discussion page.

(please end each comment with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, which will be substituted with your name and the date-time)