Talk:LSL Protocol/Restrained Love Open Relay Group/x-tensions - Revision history

Satomi Ahn: /* Validation */

2010-10-21T15:19:57Z

Validation

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:19, 21 October 2010
Line 22:		Line 22:
	So... we really need to meet and ''accept'' most x-tensions that are now in ''draft'' stage. Also we need somebody to volunteer a test suite. Several !x-tensions are already candidates for bronze or silver (and maybe higher?).		So... we really need to meet and ''accept'' most x-tensions that are now in ''draft'' stage. Also we need somebody to volunteer a test suite. Several !x-tensions are already candidates for bronze or silver (and maybe higher?).

	Another signal would be publishing relay usage statistics. After running mine, I know that about 70% of the ~~marketshare~~ is ORG ready.		Another signal would be publishing relay usage statistics. After running mine, I know that about 70% of the market is ORG ready.

	--[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 15:19, 21 October 2010 (UTC)		--[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 15:19, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Satomi Ahn at 15:19, 21 October 2010

2010-10-21T15:19:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:19, 21 October 2010
Line 16:		Line 16:

	Note the reference to an "Other Metacommands" section. I don't know what her intent exactly is, but it looks quite close to ORG goals. Shouldn't we try to inquire on this? --[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 12:15, 29 July 2009 (UTC)		Note the reference to an "Other Metacommands" section. I don't know what her intent exactly is, but it looks quite close to ORG goals. Shouldn't we try to inquire on this? --[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 12:15, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

			==Validation==
			Many x-tensions are now rather mature but never have been formally approved or tested, even though they already have several implementations both side. I know that being too formal can be rather heavy, but on the other hand knowing that a wide panel of RLV scripters approves of them gives a good signal to other furniture makers that they definitely should start using them.

			So... we really need to meet and ''accept'' most x-tensions that are now in ''draft'' stage. Also we need somebody to volunteer a test suite. Several !x-tensions are already candidates for bronze or silver (and maybe higher?).

			Another signal would be publishing relay usage statistics. After running mine, I know that about 70% of the marketshare is ORG ready.

			--[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 15:19, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Satomi Ahn: moved Talk:LSL Protocol/Restrained Life Open Relay Group/x-tensions to Talk:LSL Protocol/Restrained Love Open Relay Group/x-tensions: TPV Policy name change for RLV

2010-10-21T13:42:33Z

moved Talk:LSL Protocol/Restrained Life Open Relay Group/x-tensions to Talk:LSL Protocol/Restrained Love Open Relay Group/x-tensions: TPV Policy name change for RLV

← Older revision	Revision as of 06:42, 21 October 2010
(No difference)

Satomi Ahn at 12:15, 29 July 2009

2009-07-29T12:15:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:15, 29 July 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:

	About !x-message: I am more and more dubious about this meta-command: llInstantMessage will only make the script sleep for 2 seconds, which is not usually really an issue for such devices. Replacing it with more lag on RLVR channel doesn't look very good. Other opinions? --[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 14:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC)		About !x-message: I am more and more dubious about this meta-command: llInstantMessage will only make the script sleep for 2 seconds, which is not usually really an issue for such devices. Replacing it with more lag on RLVR channel doesn't look very good. Other opinions? --[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 14:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

			Something I spotted in Marine's specification:

			''Note from Marine : This metacommand is particularly interesting, and is likely to go to the Other Metacommands section in the future, or even in the main spec. It needs to be designed thoroughly first, though. I don't think it needs to be so complex, but it sure needs some checking.''

			Note the reference to an "Other Metacommands" section. I don't know what her intent exactly is, but it looks quite close to ORG goals. Shouldn't we try to inquire on this? --[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 12:15, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Satomi Ahn at 14:07, 27 July 2009

2009-07-27T14:07:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:07, 27 July 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	--[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 10:58, 5 May 2009 (UTC)		--[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 10:58, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
	:Answering to myself: yes it makes sense, as this very relay session won't spam other devices during that time. This could become really efficient against lag if this becomes majoritary. This should definitely be proposed to the standard protocol as mandatory for 1.050. --[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 10:00, 19 May 2009 (UTC)		:Answering to myself: yes it makes sense, as this very relay session won't spam other devices during that time. This could become really efficient against lag if this becomes majoritary. This should definitely be proposed to the standard protocol as mandatory for 1.050. --[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 10:00, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
			::For people coming after the battle: at that time, I mistook the intention of !x-listen for what is now called "!x-channel".--[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 14:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

	The command I am really looking forward to being implemented is the the !x-handover command. I can thing of some really useful uses of this .. patrolling drones sending to cells .. etc. [[User:SimonT Quinnell\|SimonT Quinnell]] 11:25, 19 July 2009 (UTC)		The command I am really looking forward to being implemented is the the !x-handover command. I can thing of some really useful uses of this .. patrolling drones sending to cells .. etc. [[User:SimonT Quinnell\|SimonT Quinnell]] 11:25, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
	:It has been implemented in my relay for ages now! But without much conviction because I didn't know any device using it, neither did I saw any real use for it. I would be interested to now more about your partolling drones! --[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 14:24, 22 July 2009 (UTC)		:It has been implemented in my relay for ages now! But without much conviction because I didn't know any device using it, neither did I saw any real use for it. I would be interested to now more about your partolling drones! --[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 14:24, 22 July 2009 (UTC)


			About !x-message: I am more and more dubious about this meta-command: llInstantMessage will only make the script sleep for 2 seconds, which is not usually really an issue for such devices. Replacing it with more lag on RLVR channel doesn't look very good. Other opinions? --[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 14:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Satomi Ahn at 14:24, 22 July 2009

2009-07-22T14:24:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:24, 22 July 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:

	The command I am really looking forward to being implemented is the the !x-handover command. I can thing of some really useful uses of this .. patrolling drones sending to cells .. etc. [[User:SimonT Quinnell\|SimonT Quinnell]] 11:25, 19 July 2009 (UTC)		The command I am really looking forward to being implemented is the the !x-handover command. I can thing of some really useful uses of this .. patrolling drones sending to cells .. etc. [[User:SimonT Quinnell\|SimonT Quinnell]] 11:25, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
			:It has been implemented in my relay for ages now! But without much conviction because I didn't know any device using it, neither did I saw any real use for it. I would be interested to now more about your partolling drones! --[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 14:24, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

SimonT Quinnell at 11:25, 19 July 2009

2009-07-19T11:25:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:25, 19 July 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	--[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 10:58, 5 May 2009 (UTC)		--[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 10:58, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
	:Answering to myself: yes it makes sense, as this very relay session won't spam other devices during that time. This could become really efficient against lag if this becomes majoritary. This should definitely be proposed to the standard protocol as mandatory for 1.050. --[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 10:00, 19 May 2009 (UTC)		:Answering to myself: yes it makes sense, as this very relay session won't spam other devices during that time. This could become really efficient against lag if this becomes majoritary. This should definitely be proposed to the standard protocol as mandatory for 1.050. --[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 10:00, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

			The command I am really looking forward to being implemented is the the !x-handover command. I can thing of some really useful uses of this .. patrolling drones sending to cells .. etc. [[User:SimonT Quinnell\|SimonT Quinnell]] 11:25, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Chloe1982 Constantine: Talk:LSL Protocol/Restrained Life Relay/ORG x-tensions moved to Talk:LSL Protocol/Restrained Life Open Relay Group/x-tensions: Moving to co-locate with the rest of the ORG pages

2009-06-11T14:27:06Z

Talk:LSL Protocol/Restrained Life Relay/ORG x-tensions moved to Talk:LSL Protocol/Restrained Life Open Relay Group/x-tensions: Moving to co-locate with the rest of the ORG pages

← Older revision	Revision as of 07:27, 11 June 2009
(No difference)

Satomi Ahn at 10:00, 19 May 2009

2009-05-19T10:00:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:00, 19 May 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Note that this would only make sense with a mono-device relay, as a multi one would still have to listen to everything on RLVR channel.		Note that this would only make sense with a mono-device relay, as a multi one would still have to listen to everything on RLVR channel.
	--[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 10:58, 5 May 2009 (UTC)		--[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 10:58, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
			:Answering to myself: yes it makes sense, as this very relay session won't spam other devices during that time. This could become really efficient against lag if this becomes majoritary. This should definitely be proposed to the standard protocol as mandatory for 1.050. --[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 10:00, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Satomi Ahn: New page: About !x-listen: is it really useful when it would be enough to listen only to the victim's relay, and for the victim's relay to listen only to the controlling device? Note that this would...

2009-05-05T10:58:06Z

New page: About !x-listen: is it really useful when it would be enough to listen only to the victim's relay, and for the victim's relay to listen only to the controlling device? Note that this would...

New page

About !x-listen: is it really useful when it would be enough to listen only to the victim's relay, and for the victim's relay to listen only to the controlling device?
Note that this would only make sense with a mono-device relay, as a multi one would still have to listen to everything on RLVR channel.
--[[User:Satomi Ahn|Satomi Ahn]] 10:58, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:07, 27 July 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	--[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 10:58, 5 May 2009 (UTC)		--[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 10:58, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
	:Answering to myself: yes it makes sense, as this very relay session won't spam other devices during that time. This could become really efficient against lag if this becomes majoritary. This should definitely be proposed to the standard protocol as mandatory for 1.050. --[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 10:00, 19 May 2009 (UTC)		:Answering to myself: yes it makes sense, as this very relay session won't spam other devices during that time. This could become really efficient against lag if this becomes majoritary. This should definitely be proposed to the standard protocol as mandatory for 1.050. --[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 10:00, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
			::For people coming after the battle: at that time, I mistook the intention of !x-listen for what is now called "!x-channel".--[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 14:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

	The command I am really looking forward to being implemented is the the !x-handover command. I can thing of some really useful uses of this .. patrolling drones sending to cells .. etc. [[User:SimonT Quinnell\|SimonT Quinnell]] 11:25, 19 July 2009 (UTC)		The command I am really looking forward to being implemented is the the !x-handover command. I can thing of some really useful uses of this .. patrolling drones sending to cells .. etc. [[User:SimonT Quinnell\|SimonT Quinnell]] 11:25, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
	:It has been implemented in my relay for ages now! But without much conviction because I didn't know any device using it, neither did I saw any real use for it. I would be interested to now more about your partolling drones! --[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 14:24, 22 July 2009 (UTC)		:It has been implemented in my relay for ages now! But without much conviction because I didn't know any device using it, neither did I saw any real use for it. I would be interested to now more about your partolling drones! --[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 14:24, 22 July 2009 (UTC)


			About !x-message: I am more and more dubious about this meta-command: llInstantMessage will only make the script sleep for 2 seconds, which is not usually really an issue for such devices. Replacing it with more lag on RLVR channel doesn't look very good. Other opinions? --[[User:Satomi Ahn\|Satomi Ahn]] 14:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC)