Talk:LlRequestURL - Revision history

Omei Qunhua: Explanation for code changes

2015-12-14T22:06:56Z

Explanation for code changes

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:06, 14 December 2015
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Is the example given on this page the minimal recommended script? I don't see why I need to re-acquire a URL on CHANGED_INVENTORY.		Is the example given on this page the minimal recommended script? I don't see why I need to re-acquire a URL on CHANGED_INVENTORY.

			== Unnecessary code ==

			The first example never needs to use llReleaseURL() because the script only requests URLs under these three circumstances:
			a) in state_entry() which in this script only happens when the script is reset, and resetting the script inherently releases URLs
			b) after a region restart. But that process will have released all URLs
			c) on change of Region ... but the URL will have been released from the old region by virtue of the object exiting that region, and attempting to release a URL after detecting a change of region is pointless, or down-right in error, as the URL you are trying to release belonged to the region the object is no longer in.

			The code to check for "dropped URLs" at five minute intervals seems bizarre and superfluous. [[User:Omei Qunhua\|Omei Qunhua]] ([[User talk:Omei Qunhua\|talk]]) 14:06, 14 December 2015 (PST)

Cron Stardust: /* Are URLs automatically released when the script is reset? */

2014-07-12T01:21:29Z

Are URLs automatically released when the script is reset?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:21, 11 July 2014
Line 6:		Line 6:

	I tend to assume so, since otherwise they'll be constantly leaking when one edits and tests scripts that request URLs. But is that a good assumption? [[User:Dale Innis\|Dale Innis]] 19:38, 3 November 2009 (UTC)		I tend to assume so, since otherwise they'll be constantly leaking when one edits and tests scripts that request URLs. But is that a good assumption? [[User:Dale Innis\|Dale Innis]] 19:38, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

			: According to my testing on Second Life Server 14.06.20.291351 yes; the URL is released upon reset. I've also written a LOT of code that uses URLs all running in the same simulator for quite a while and I've not run into a URL outage yet. In fact the available count showed over 14000 left! [[User:Cron Stardust\|Cron Stardust]] 18:21, 11 July 2014 (PDT)

	== Minimal example? ==		== Minimal example? ==

	Is the example given on this page the minimal recommended script? I don't see why I need to re-acquire a URL on CHANGED_INVENTORY.		Is the example given on this page the minimal recommended script? I don't see why I need to re-acquire a URL on CHANGED_INVENTORY.

Schwanpuhl Resident: /* Minimal example? */ new section

2013-04-17T22:32:14Z

Minimal example?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:32, 17 April 2013
Line 6:		Line 6:

	I tend to assume so, since otherwise they'll be constantly leaking when one edits and tests scripts that request URLs. But is that a good assumption? [[User:Dale Innis\|Dale Innis]] 19:38, 3 November 2009 (UTC)		I tend to assume so, since otherwise they'll be constantly leaking when one edits and tests scripts that request URLs. But is that a good assumption? [[User:Dale Innis\|Dale Innis]] 19:38, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

			== Minimal example? ==

			Is the example given on this page the minimal recommended script? I don't see why I need to re-acquire a URL on CHANGED_INVENTORY.

Dale Innis: /* Are URLs automatically released when the script is reset? */

2009-11-03T19:38:40Z

Are URLs automatically released when the script is reset?

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:38, 3 November 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	== Are URLs automatically released when the script is reset? ==		== Are URLs automatically released when the script is reset? ==

	I tend to assume so, since otherwise they'll be constantly leaking when one edits and tests scripts that request URLs. But is that a good assumption?		I tend to assume so, since otherwise they'll be constantly leaking when one edits and tests scripts that request URLs. But is that a good assumption? [[User:Dale Innis\|Dale Innis]] 19:38, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Dale Innis: /* Are URLs automatically released when the script is reset? */ new section

2009-11-03T19:38:19Z

Are URLs automatically released when the script is reset?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:38, 3 November 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	[[User:Hg Beeks\|Hg Beeks]] 09:41, 10 August 2009 (UTC)		[[User:Hg Beeks\|Hg Beeks]] 09:41, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

			== Are URLs automatically released when the script is reset? ==

			I tend to assume so, since otherwise they'll be constantly leaking when one edits and tests scripts that request URLs. But is that a good assumption?

Hg Beeks: Created page with 'One thing I couldn't help but notice - The URL generates a UUID as a specific URL, but from what I can tell, it's not a correctly formatted one - The version digit is just as ran...'

2009-08-10T09:41:47Z

Created page with 'One thing I couldn't help but notice - The URL generates a UUID as a specific URL, but from what I can tell, it's not a correctly formatted one - The version digit is just as ran...'

New page

One thing I couldn't help but notice - The URL generates a UUID as a specific URL, but from what I can tell, it's not a correctly formatted one - The version digit is just as random as the others. Not really an issue, but I do find it odd that they didn't even use version 4, as they did with inworld IDs.

[[User:Hg Beeks|Hg Beeks]] 09:41, 10 August 2009 (UTC)