Talk:Second Life Railroad - Revision history

Vaughn Deluca: /* Content editing and removal */

2010-09-12T11:47:52Z

Content editing and removal

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:47, 12 September 2010
Line 23:		Line 23:
	:* Removal of "SLRR Station" would be counter productive and self serving. Certainly not in the best interest of the SL users who want this information. --[[User:Stryker Jenkins\|Stryker J]] 10:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC)<BR>		:* Removal of "SLRR Station" would be counter productive and self serving. Certainly not in the best interest of the SL users who want this information. --[[User:Stryker Jenkins\|Stryker J]] 10:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC)<BR>
	: This is a "straw man fallacy" Stryker, nobody is proposing that the section be removed. Most residents use classified ads and work hard to build popularity and traffic for better search results, etc. The rest of us are playing Second Life, what game are you playing? [[User:Jer Straaf\|Jer Straaf]] 22:53, 7 September 2010 (UTC)		: This is a "straw man fallacy" Stryker, nobody is proposing that the section be removed. Most residents use classified ads and work hard to build popularity and traffic for better search results, etc. The rest of us are playing Second Life, what game are you playing? [[User:Jer Straaf\|Jer Straaf]] 22:53, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
			<BR><BR>
			We seem to have a working solution for the problems with this page, but there are a few open ends that i think should be fixed.
			The current page text says about the SLRR:
			<BR><BR>
			"Some residents feel it is completely unnecessary, some residents believe that it should remain free and open for use by all residents, others have tried to control and restrict usage of the SLRR. Some residents believe that the LDPW shows favoritism towards one particular SL railroading group."<BR><BR>
			This text is a left over of the past wiki war. I do not think is provides a very inviting introduction to the SLRR. For sure we must be able to do better on the front page. My suggestion is that we have a short dicussion here to find a format acceptable to all, that is a bit more positive. Any takers? [[User:Vaughn Deluca\|Vaughn Deluca]] 11:47, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

	== Linden word on the subject ;) ==		== Linden word on the subject ;) ==

Jer Straaf: /* Content editing and removal */

2010-09-07T22:57:33Z

Content editing and removal

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:57, 7 September 2010
Line 22:		Line 22:

	:* Removal of "SLRR Station" would be counter productive and self serving. Certainly not in the best interest of the SL users who want this information. --[[User:Stryker Jenkins\|Stryker J]] 10:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC)<BR>		:* Removal of "SLRR Station" would be counter productive and self serving. Certainly not in the best interest of the SL users who want this information. --[[User:Stryker Jenkins\|Stryker J]] 10:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC)<BR>
	: This is a "straw man fallacy" Stryker, nobody is proposing that it be removed. Most residents use classified ads and work hard to build popularity and traffic for better search results, etc. The rest of us are playing Second Life, what game are you playing? [[User:Jer Straaf\|Jer Straaf]] 22:53, 7 September 2010 (UTC)		: This is a "straw man fallacy" Stryker, nobody is proposing that the section be removed. Most residents use classified ads and work hard to build popularity and traffic for better search results, etc. The rest of us are playing Second Life, what game are you playing? [[User:Jer Straaf\|Jer Straaf]] 22:53, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

	== Linden word on the subject ;) ==		== Linden word on the subject ;) ==

Jer Straaf: /* Content editing and removal */

2010-09-07T22:53:39Z

Content editing and removal

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:53, 7 September 2010
Line 22:		Line 22:

	:* Removal of "SLRR Station" would be counter productive and self serving. Certainly not in the best interest of the SL users who want this information. --[[User:Stryker Jenkins\|Stryker J]] 10:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC)<BR>		:* Removal of "SLRR Station" would be counter productive and self serving. Certainly not in the best interest of the SL users who want this information. --[[User:Stryker Jenkins\|Stryker J]] 10:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC)<BR>
	: This is a "straw man fallacy" Stryker, nobody is proposing that it be removed~~, so why say something nobody wants to do is counterproductive? Drama?~~ Most residents use classified ads and work hard to build popularity and traffic for better search results, etc. The rest of us are playing Second Life, what game are you playing? [[User:Jer Straaf\|Jer Straaf]] 22:53, 7 September 2010 (UTC)		: This is a "straw man fallacy" Stryker, nobody is proposing that it be removed. Most residents use classified ads and work hard to build popularity and traffic for better search results, etc. The rest of us are playing Second Life, what game are you playing? [[User:Jer Straaf\|Jer Straaf]] 22:53, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

	== Linden word on the subject ;) ==		== Linden word on the subject ;) ==

Jer Straaf: /* Content editing and removal */

2010-09-07T22:53:01Z

Content editing and removal

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:53, 7 September 2010
Line 21:		Line 21:
	[[User:Jer Straaf\|Jer Straaf]] 23:37, 6 September 2010 (UTC)		[[User:Jer Straaf\|Jer Straaf]] 23:37, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

	:* Removal of "SLRR Station" would be counter productive and self serving. Certainly not in the best interest of the SL users who want this information. --[[User:Stryker Jenkins\|Stryker J]] 10:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC)		:* Removal of "SLRR Station" would be counter productive and self serving. Certainly not in the best interest of the SL users who want this information. --[[User:Stryker Jenkins\|Stryker J]] 10:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC)<BR>
			: This is a "straw man fallacy" Stryker, nobody is proposing that it be removed, so why say something nobody wants to do is counterproductive? Drama? Most residents use classified ads and work hard to build popularity and traffic for better search results, etc. The rest of us are playing Second Life, what game are you playing? [[User:Jer Straaf\|Jer Straaf]] 22:53, 7 September 2010 (UTC)


	== Linden word on the subject ;) ==		== Linden word on the subject ;) ==

Jer Straaf: /* SLRR Wiki Watchers */

2010-09-07T12:11:15Z

SLRR Wiki Watchers

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:11, 7 September 2010
Line 23:		Line 23:
	:* Removal of "SLRR Station" would be counter productive and self serving. Certainly not in the best interest of the SL users who want this information. --[[User:Stryker Jenkins\|Stryker J]] 10:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC)		:* Removal of "SLRR Station" would be counter productive and self serving. Certainly not in the best interest of the SL users who want this information. --[[User:Stryker Jenkins\|Stryker J]] 10:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

	~~== SLRR Wiki Watchers ==~~
	~~Members of Loco Motives and the SLRR Rail Group will be assigned to monitor the edit history of this article on a daily basis.<BR>~~
	~~This is unfortunate, SL is supposed to be fun.<BR>~~
	~~[[User:Jer Straaf\|Jer Straaf]] 07:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC)~~

	:*Content retaining to '''other pages''' should be posted on their respective [[Talk:Second_Life_Railroad/SLRR_History\|talk pages]]. '''Not here'''. --[[User:Stryker Jenkins\|Stryker J]] 10:05, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

	== Linden word on the subject ;) ==		== Linden word on the subject ;) ==

Stryker Jenkins: /* Content editing and removal */

2010-09-07T10:07:18Z

Content editing and removal

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:07, 7 September 2010
Line 19:		Line 19:
	If the information is about Linden Labs' SLRR, is objective and is factual, it stays. If it is off-topic, biased or self-serving, it goes. It's that easy, Stryker, everyone except you gets that.<BR>		If the information is about Linden Labs' SLRR, is objective and is factual, it stays. If it is off-topic, biased or self-serving, it goes. It's that easy, Stryker, everyone except you gets that.<BR>
	Yevad Doobie has even filed a support ticket to have his entry removed from the "SLRR Stations" list.<BR>		Yevad Doobie has even filed a support ticket to have his entry removed from the "SLRR Stations" list.<BR>
	[[User:Jer Straaf\|Jer Straaf]] 23:37, 6 September 2010 (UTC)~~<BR>~~		[[User:Jer Straaf\|Jer Straaf]] 23:37, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
	~~<BR>~~
			:* Removal of "SLRR Station" would be counter productive and self serving. Certainly not in the best interest of the SL users who want this information. --[[User:Stryker Jenkins\|Stryker J]] 10:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

	== SLRR Wiki Watchers ==		== SLRR Wiki Watchers ==

Stryker Jenkins: /* SLRR Wiki Watchers */ remarks out of place on wrong talk page

2010-09-07T10:05:38Z

SLRR Wiki Watchers: remarks out of place on wrong talk page

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:05, 7 September 2010
Line 25:		Line 25:
	Members of Loco Motives and the SLRR Rail Group will be assigned to monitor the edit history of this article on a daily basis.<BR>		Members of Loco Motives and the SLRR Rail Group will be assigned to monitor the edit history of this article on a daily basis.<BR>
	This is unfortunate, SL is supposed to be fun.<BR>		This is unfortunate, SL is supposed to be fun.<BR>
	[[User:Jer Straaf\|Jer Straaf]] 07:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC)~~<BR>~~		[[User:Jer Straaf\|Jer Straaf]] 07:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
	~~<BR>~~
			:*Content retaining to '''other pages''' should be posted on their respective [[Talk:Second_Life_Railroad/SLRR_History\|talk pages]]. '''Not here'''. --[[User:Stryker Jenkins\|Stryker J]] 10:05, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

	== Linden word on the subject ;) ==		== Linden word on the subject ;) ==

Stryker Jenkins: /* Page integrity */

2010-09-07T10:01:55Z

Page integrity

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:01, 7 September 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:
	== Page integrity ==		== Page integrity ==

	For some reason [[User2\|Jer Straaf}} feels it is needed to give the users only access to his point of view on these pages. I am removing the images and content I created for these pages, and do '''NO LONGER ALLOW ANYONE TO USE THEM''' on the Second Life Wiki. As of now 6 September 2010 the page integrity has been compromised and should been seen as grieving propaganda from {{User2\|Jer Straaf}}, {{User2\|Yevad_Doobie}} and {{User2\|DOUGIE_Flossberg}}.[[User:Stryker Jenkins]] 06:38, 7 September 2010 (UTC)		For some reason {{User2\|Jer Straaf}} feels it is needed to give the users only access to his point of view on these pages. I am removing the images and content I created for these pages, and do '''NO LONGER ALLOW ANYONE TO USE THEM''' on the Second Life Wiki. As of now 6 September 2010 the page integrity has been compromised and should been seen as grieving propaganda from {{User2\|Jer Straaf}}, {{User2\|Yevad_Doobie}} and {{User2\|DOUGIE_Flossberg}}.[[User:Stryker Jenkins]] 06:38, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

	The statement made here by Stryker is untrue. He has given no specific examples because there are none.<BR>		The statement made here by Stryker is untrue. He has given no specific examples because there are none.<BR>

Stryker Jenkins: /* Page integrity */ Forgot to sign my post. Sorry

2010-09-07T10:01:39Z

Page integrity: Forgot to sign my post. Sorry

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:01, 7 September 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:
	== Page integrity ==		== Page integrity ==

	For some reason [[User2\|Jer Straaf}} feels it is needed to give the users only access to his point of view on these pages. I am removing the images and content I created for these pages, and do '''NO LONGER ALLOW ANYONE TO USE THEM''' on the Second Life Wiki. As of now 6 September 2010 the page integrity has been compromised and should been seen as grieving propaganda from [[User2\|Jer Straaf}}, [[User2\|Yevad_Doobie}} and [[User2\|DOUGIE_Flossberg}}.		For some reason [[User2\|Jer Straaf}} feels it is needed to give the users only access to his point of view on these pages. I am removing the images and content I created for these pages, and do '''NO LONGER ALLOW ANYONE TO USE THEM''' on the Second Life Wiki. As of now 6 September 2010 the page integrity has been compromised and should been seen as grieving propaganda from {{User2\|Jer Straaf}}, {{User2\|Yevad_Doobie}} and {{User2\|DOUGIE_Flossberg}}.[[User:Stryker Jenkins]] 06:38, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
	~~<BR><BR>~~
	~~NOTE: The unsigned post above was made by Stryker Jenkins.<BR>~~
	[[User:~~Jer Straaf\|Jer Straaf~~]] 06:38, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
	~~<BR><BR>~~
	The statement made here by Stryker is untrue. He has given no specific examples because there are none.<BR>		The statement made here by Stryker is untrue. He has given no specific examples because there are none.<BR>
	Unless my changes have been un-done again, this wiki article is now clear, concise and well organized. With the exception of the VRC advertisements, it is also objective.<BR>		Unless my changes have been un-done again, this wiki article is now clear, concise and well organized. With the exception of the VRC advertisements, it is also objective.<BR>

Jer Straaf: /* Page integrity */

2010-09-07T07:20:25Z

Page integrity

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:20, 7 September 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	[[User:Jer Straaf\|Jer Straaf]] 06:38, 7 September 2010 (UTC)		[[User:Jer Straaf\|Jer Straaf]] 06:38, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
	<BR><BR>		<BR><BR>
	~~Exactly the opposite has been occurring.~~ The statement made here by Stryker is untrue. He has given no specific examples because there are none.<BR>		The statement made here by Stryker is untrue. He has given no specific examples because there are none.<BR>
	Unless my changes have been un-done again, this wiki article is now clear, concise and well organized. With the exception of the VRC advertisements, it is also objective.<BR>		Unless my changes have been un-done again, this wiki article is now clear, concise and well organized. With the exception of the VRC advertisements, it is also objective.<BR>
	Please look at this article and form your own opinion.<BR>		Please look at this article and form your own opinion.<BR>