User talk:Acheron Gloom - Revision history

Strife Onizuka: /* llTeleportAgentHome - EM not Owner? */

2012-07-28T17:23:06Z

llTeleportAgentHome - EM not Owner?

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:23, 28 July 2012
Line 13:		Line 13:

	That sounds like the new wording they were discussing in {{Jira\|SVC-7403}}. -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka\|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka\|contribs]])</small></sup> 09:06, 28 July 2012 (PDT)		That sounds like the new wording they were discussing in {{Jira\|SVC-7403}}. -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka\|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka\|contribs]])</small></sup> 09:06, 28 July 2012 (PDT)

			I've pulled the info from {{Jira\|SVC-7403}} and put it into the articles. I'm not totally satisfied with the wording, so if you want to play with it, please do. You can find it here:
			[[Template:LSL_Function/security]] -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka\|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka\|contribs]])</small></sup> 10:23, 28 July 2012 (PDT)

Strife Onizuka: /* llTeleportAgentHome - EM not Owner? */

2012-07-28T16:08:19Z

llTeleportAgentHome - EM not Owner?

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:08, 28 July 2012
Line 12:		Line 12:
	Odd either way. And confusing. <small>Acheron Gloom</small> 05:03, 28 July 2012 (PDT)		Odd either way. And confusing. <small>Acheron Gloom</small> 05:03, 28 July 2012 (PDT)

	That sounds like the new wording they were discussing in {{Jira\|SVC-~~6360~~}}. -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka\|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka\|contribs]])</small></sup> 09:06, 28 July 2012 (PDT)		That sounds like the new wording they were discussing in {{Jira\|SVC-7403}}. -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka\|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka\|contribs]])</small></sup> 09:06, 28 July 2012 (PDT)

Strife Onizuka at 16:06, 28 July 2012

2012-07-28T16:06:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:06, 28 July 2012
Line 11:		Line 11:
	I just tested it with two more sims. I tested with Titan and Kryar. Both are private island sims. Both are tier 5. I had an EM use a llTeleportAgentHome function to teleport both myself and him home, it worked for both of us. It did not work if my EM in Titan tried to teleport me home when in a parcel owned by another group. He did not have 'eject and freeze agents' permission in that group, so that might be it.		I just tested it with two more sims. I tested with Titan and Kryar. Both are private island sims. Both are tier 5. I had an EM use a llTeleportAgentHome function to teleport both myself and him home, it worked for both of us. It did not work if my EM in Titan tried to teleport me home when in a parcel owned by another group. He did not have 'eject and freeze agents' permission in that group, so that might be it.
	Odd either way. And confusing. <small>Acheron Gloom</small> 05:03, 28 July 2012 (PDT)		Odd either way. And confusing. <small>Acheron Gloom</small> 05:03, 28 July 2012 (PDT)

			That sounds like the new wording they were discussing in {{Jira\|SVC-6360}}. -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka\|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka\|contribs]])</small></sup> 09:06, 28 July 2012 (PDT)

Acheron Gloom: /* llTeleportAgentHome - EM not Owner? */ I don't know how2signature, but whatever.

2012-07-28T12:05:36Z

llTeleportAgentHome - EM not Owner?: I don't know how2signature, but whatever.

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:05, 28 July 2012
Line 10:		Line 10:

	I just tested it with two more sims. I tested with Titan and Kryar. Both are private island sims. Both are tier 5. I had an EM use a llTeleportAgentHome function to teleport both myself and him home, it worked for both of us. It did not work if my EM in Titan tried to teleport me home when in a parcel owned by another group. He did not have 'eject and freeze agents' permission in that group, so that might be it.		I just tested it with two more sims. I tested with Titan and Kryar. Both are private island sims. Both are tier 5. I had an EM use a llTeleportAgentHome function to teleport both myself and him home, it worked for both of us. It did not work if my EM in Titan tried to teleport me home when in a parcel owned by another group. He did not have 'eject and freeze agents' permission in that group, so that might be it.
	Odd either way. And confusing.		Odd either way. And confusing. <small>Acheron Gloom</small> 05:03, 28 July 2012 (PDT)

Acheron Gloom at 12:03, 28 July 2012

2012-07-28T12:03:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:03, 28 July 2012
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Are you absolutely sure? It's in direct contention with {{Jira\|SVC-6360}} (which is requesting the addition of EM use for the function) and it would be a breaking change, which we would have heard about (main land security bots would stop functioning as they currently function). It is possible the function works differently between estates and the mainland but I kinda doubt it. -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka\|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka\|contribs]])</small></sup> 01:27, 28 July 2012 (PDT)		Are you absolutely sure? It's in direct contention with {{Jira\|SVC-6360}} (which is requesting the addition of EM use for the function) and it would be a breaking change, which we would have heard about (main land security bots would stop functioning as they currently function). It is possible the function works differently between estates and the mainland but I kinda doubt it. -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka\|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka\|contribs]])</small></sup> 01:27, 28 July 2012 (PDT)

			I just tested it with two more sims. I tested with Titan and Kryar. Both are private island sims. Both are tier 5. I had an EM use a llTeleportAgentHome function to teleport both myself and him home, it worked for both of us. It did not work if my EM in Titan tried to teleport me home when in a parcel owned by another group. He did not have 'eject and freeze agents' permission in that group, so that might be it.
			Odd either way. And confusing.

Strife Onizuka: /* llTeleportAgentHome - EM not Owner? */ new section

2012-07-28T08:27:29Z

llTeleportAgentHome - EM not Owner?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:27, 28 July 2012
Line 4:		Line 4:
	{{Footnotes}}		{{Footnotes}}
	--'''[[User:Strife_Onizuka\|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka\|contribs]])</small></sup> 17:07, 21 July 2012 (PDT)		--'''[[User:Strife_Onizuka\|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka\|contribs]])</small></sup> 17:07, 21 July 2012 (PDT)

			== [[llTeleportAgentHome]] - EM not Owner? ==

			Are you absolutely sure? It's in direct contention with {{Jira\|SVC-6360}} (which is requesting the addition of EM use for the function) and it would be a breaking change, which we would have heard about (main land security bots would stop functioning as they currently function). It is possible the function works differently between estates and the mainland but I kinda doubt it. -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka\|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka\|contribs]])</small></sup> 01:27, 28 July 2012 (PDT)

Strife Onizuka at 00:07, 22 July 2012

2012-07-22T00:07:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:07, 21 July 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Great edits. Keep up the good work. Please don't feel you need to ask permission to add to the documentation, the documentation is too sparse as it is. Changing things might need a discussion to feel out where the community stands but additions are always{{Footnote\|Almost always, we have to be able to cull superfluous, distracting and duplicate content}} safe{{Footnote\|Safe only in the sense that the ideas will be maintained, not necessarily the words that are used to describe them. Anyway it's the ideas that are important, not the words that convey them}}. The LSL Portal has two mandates that are at cross purposes, the resulting compromise is the current documentation style/layout. The documentation style not only provides space for content aimed at beginners and experts but requires that content be provided to meat the mandates. Most articles are good for experts but for beginners are barely better than stubs{{Footnote\|If you're interested in working on beginner content let me know and we can talk template features and layout.}}. So keep up the good work.		Great edits. Keep up the good work. Please don't feel you need to ask permission to add to the documentation, the documentation is too sparse as it is. Changing things might need a discussion to feel out where the community stands but additions are always{{Footnote\|Almost always, we have to be able to cull superfluous, distracting and duplicate content}} safe{{Footnote\|Safe only in the sense that the ideas will be maintained, not necessarily the words that are used to describe them. Anyway it's the ideas that are important, not the words that convey them}}. The LSL Portal has two mandates that are at cross purposes, the resulting compromise is the current documentation style/layout. The documentation style not only provides space for content aimed at beginners and experts but requires that content be provided to meat the mandates. Most articles are good for experts but for beginners are barely better than stubs{{Footnote\|If you're interested in working on beginner content let me know and we can talk template features and layout.}}. So keep up the good work.
	{{Footnotes}}		{{Footnotes}}
			--'''[[User:Strife_Onizuka\|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka\|contribs]])</small></sup> 17:07, 21 July 2012 (PDT)

Strife Onizuka: Good work ^_^

2012-07-21T06:20:13Z

Good work ^_^

New page

== Good work ^_^ ==

Great edits. Keep up the good work. Please don't feel you need to ask permission to add to the documentation, the documentation is too sparse as it is. Changing things might need a discussion to feel out where the community stands but additions are always{{Footnote|Almost always, we have to be able to cull superfluous, distracting and duplicate content}} safe{{Footnote|Safe only in the sense that the ideas will be maintained, not necessarily the words that are used to describe them. Anyway it's the ideas that are important, not the words that convey them}}. The LSL Portal has two mandates that are at cross purposes, the resulting compromise is the current documentation style/layout. The documentation style not only provides space for content aimed at beginners and experts but requires that content be provided to meat the mandates. Most articles are good for experts but for beginners are barely better than stubs{{Footnote|If you're interested in working on beginner content let me know and we can talk template features and layout.}}. So keep up the good work.
{{Footnotes}}