User talk:Finrod Meriman/AWG Feedback - Revision history

Rob Linden: Talk:Mic's Feedback moved to User talk:Finrod Meriman/AWG Feedback: Moving into user space

2007-11-06T22:54:31Z

Talk:Mic's Feedback moved to User talk:Finrod Meriman/AWG Feedback: Moving into user space

← Older revision	Revision as of 15:54, 6 November 2007
(No difference)

Burhop Piccard: /* 2) Make our architectural "views" explicit. */

2007-10-04T00:46:09Z

2) Make our architectural "views" explicit.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:46, 3 October 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	* I've written a comment about it in the [[Talk:Multiple_Domains#How to link domains]] page. ---[[User:Morgaine Dinova\|Morgaine Dinova]] 12:07, 26 September 2007 (PDT)		* I've written a comment about it in the [[Talk:Multiple_Domains#How to link domains]] page. ---[[User:Morgaine Dinova\|Morgaine Dinova]] 12:07, 26 September 2007 (PDT)

	Mic - good summary. I'd also like to understand better how the data moves around, especially geometry. Collada was a good point~~. I've brought it up before but its been dismissed as yet "another~~ standard".--[[User:Burhop Piccard\|Burhop Piccard]] 17:43, 3 October 2007 (PDT)		Mic - good summary. I'd also like to understand better how the data moves around, especially geometry. Collada was a good point and some standard (any standard!) would be good. For companies, they will want two things: Security and a way to control and import content --[[User:Burhop Piccard\|Burhop Piccard]] 17:43, 3 October 2007 (PDT)

Burhop Piccard at 00:43, 4 October 2007

2007-10-04T00:43:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:43, 3 October 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	* I've written a comment about it in the [[Talk:Multiple_Domains#How to link domains]] page. ---[[User:Morgaine Dinova\|Morgaine Dinova]] 12:07, 26 September 2007 (PDT)		* I've written a comment about it in the [[Talk:Multiple_Domains#How to link domains]] page. ---[[User:Morgaine Dinova\|Morgaine Dinova]] 12:07, 26 September 2007 (PDT)

	Mic - good summary. I'd also like to understand better how the data moves around, especially geometry. Collada was a good point. I've brought it up before but its been dismissed as yet "another standard".		Mic - good summary. I'd also like to understand better how the data moves around, especially geometry. Collada was a good point. I've brought it up before but its been dismissed as yet "another standard".--[[User:Burhop Piccard\|Burhop Piccard]] 17:43, 3 October 2007 (PDT)
	----

Burhop Piccard: /* 2) Make our architectural "views" explicit. */

2007-10-04T00:42:01Z

2) Make our architectural "views" explicit.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:42, 3 October 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:

	* I've written a comment about it in the [[Talk:Multiple_Domains#How to link domains]] page. ---[[User:Morgaine Dinova\|Morgaine Dinova]] 12:07, 26 September 2007 (PDT)		* I've written a comment about it in the [[Talk:Multiple_Domains#How to link domains]] page. ---[[User:Morgaine Dinova\|Morgaine Dinova]] 12:07, 26 September 2007 (PDT)

			Mic - good summary. I'd also like to understand better how the data moves around, especially geometry. Collada was a good point. I've brought it up before but its been dismissed as yet "another standard".
			----

Morgaine Dinova at 19:12, 26 September 2007

2007-09-26T19:12:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:12, 26 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
			== 2) Make our architectural "views" explicit. ==

	* I indentified with your comments here strongly, because I've been trying to analyse the basis for claimed scalability in the AWG architectural diagrams and did not find what I was looking for. Taking the perspective of your report and with a nod to IEEE-1471, I find that the scalability viewpoint has not been described, just as you found that the functional viewpoint was hard to discern.		* I indentified with your comments here strongly, because I've been trying to analyse the basis for claimed scalability in the AWG architectural diagrams and did not find what I was looking for. Taking the perspective of your report and with a nod to IEEE-1471, I find that the scalability viewpoint has not been described, just as you found that the functional viewpoint was hard to discern.

	* I've written a comment about it in the [[Talk:Multiple_Domains#How to link domains]] page. ---[[User:Morgaine Dinova\|Morgaine Dinova]] 12:07, 26 September 2007 (PDT)		* I've written a comment about it in the [[Talk:Multiple_Domains#How to link domains]] page. ---[[User:Morgaine Dinova\|Morgaine Dinova]] 12:07, 26 September 2007 (PDT)

Morgaine Dinova: New page: * I indentified with your comments here strongly, because I've been trying to analyse the basis for claimed scalability in the AWG architectural diagrams and did not find what I was lookin...

2007-09-26T19:07:29Z

New page: * I indentified with your comments here strongly, because I've been trying to analyse the basis for claimed scalability in the AWG architectural diagrams and did not find what I was lookin...

New page

* I indentified with your comments here strongly, because I've been trying to analyse the basis for claimed scalability in the AWG architectural diagrams and did not find what I was looking for. Taking the perspective of your report and with a nod to IEEE-1471, I find that the scalability viewpoint has not been described, just as you found that the functional viewpoint was hard to discern.

* I've written a comment about it in the [[Talk:Multiple_Domains#How to link domains]] page. ---[[User:Morgaine Dinova|Morgaine Dinova]] 12:07, 26 September 2007 (PDT)