User talk:Nexii Malthus - Revision history

Strife Onizuka: /* Hierarchics */

2012-08-13T05:48:01Z

Hierarchics

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:48, 12 August 2012
Line 25:		Line 25:
	:Hi, I noticed you released this code into the public domain. Just wanted to say that I have no problem releasing the changes I made also into the public domain as well. I'm pretty flexible about license but others may not so take care in the future; at least give them some warning on the talk page. -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka\|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka\|contribs]])</small></sup> 17:48, 10 January 2010 (UTC)		:Hi, I noticed you released this code into the public domain. Just wanted to say that I have no problem releasing the changes I made also into the public domain as well. I'm pretty flexible about license but others may not so take care in the future; at least give them some warning on the talk page. -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka\|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka\|contribs]])</small></sup> 17:48, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

	With all the changes to LSL ([[PRIM_ROT_LOCAL]] for one), have you considered writing a slaveless version? What I mean to say, is a version that requires no scripts in the ~~slaves~~? -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka\|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka\|contribs]])</small></sup> 22:47, 12 August 2012 (PDT)		== [[Hierarchics]] Reboot ==

			With all the changes to LSL ([[PRIM_ROT_LOCAL]] for one), have you considered writing a slaveless version? What I mean to say, is a version that requires no scripts in the children? -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka\|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka\|contribs]])</small></sup> 22:47, 12 August 2012 (PDT)

	== Signature Test ==		== Signature Test ==
	Testing my nice new signature -> --[[User:Nexii Malthus\|<span style="color: #bbb; text-shadow:-1px -1px #ddd, 1px 1px #888;">Nexii Malthus</span>]] 23:14, 14 February 2010 (UTC)		Testing my nice new signature -> --[[User:Nexii Malthus\|<span style="color: #bbb; text-shadow:-1px -1px #ddd, 1px 1px #888;">Nexii Malthus</span>]] 23:14, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Strife Onizuka: /* Hierarchics */

2012-08-13T05:47:26Z

Hierarchics

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:47, 12 August 2012
Line 24:		Line 24:

	:Hi, I noticed you released this code into the public domain. Just wanted to say that I have no problem releasing the changes I made also into the public domain as well. I'm pretty flexible about license but others may not so take care in the future; at least give them some warning on the talk page. -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka\|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka\|contribs]])</small></sup> 17:48, 10 January 2010 (UTC)		:Hi, I noticed you released this code into the public domain. Just wanted to say that I have no problem releasing the changes I made also into the public domain as well. I'm pretty flexible about license but others may not so take care in the future; at least give them some warning on the talk page. -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka\|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka\|contribs]])</small></sup> 17:48, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

			With all the changes to LSL ([[PRIM_ROT_LOCAL]] for one), have you considered writing a slaveless version? What I mean to say, is a version that requires no scripts in the slaves? -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka\|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka\|contribs]])</small></sup> 22:47, 12 August 2012 (PDT)

	== Signature Test ==		== Signature Test ==
	Testing my nice new signature -> --[[User:Nexii Malthus\|<span style="color: #bbb; text-shadow:-1px -1px #ddd, 1px 1px #888;">Nexii Malthus</span>]] 23:14, 14 February 2010 (UTC)		Testing my nice new signature -> --[[User:Nexii Malthus\|<span style="color: #bbb; text-shadow:-1px -1px #ddd, 1px 1px #888;">Nexii Malthus</span>]] 23:14, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Nexii Malthus at 23:14, 14 February 2010

2010-02-14T23:14:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:14, 14 February 2010
Line 24:		Line 24:

	:Hi, I noticed you released this code into the public domain. Just wanted to say that I have no problem releasing the changes I made also into the public domain as well. I'm pretty flexible about license but others may not so take care in the future; at least give them some warning on the talk page. -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka\|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka\|contribs]])</small></sup> 17:48, 10 January 2010 (UTC)		:Hi, I noticed you released this code into the public domain. Just wanted to say that I have no problem releasing the changes I made also into the public domain as well. I'm pretty flexible about license but others may not so take care in the future; at least give them some warning on the talk page. -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka\|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka\|contribs]])</small></sup> 17:48, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

			== Signature Test ==
			Testing my nice new signature -> --[[User:Nexii Malthus\|<span style="color: #bbb; text-shadow:-1px -1px #ddd, 1px 1px #888;">Nexii Malthus</span>]] 23:14, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Strife Onizuka: /* Hierarchics */ licensing

2010-01-10T17:48:45Z

Hierarchics: licensing

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:48, 10 January 2010
Line 22:		Line 22:
	* Fix: In edit mode the (ChangedRot && ChangedPos) code is dead due to preceding logic... and inconsistent with preceding code.		* Fix: In edit mode the (ChangedRot && ChangedPos) code is dead due to preceding logic... and inconsistent with preceding code.
	-- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka\|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka\|contribs]])</small></sup> 23:33, 6 May 2009 (UTC)		-- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka\|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka\|contribs]])</small></sup> 23:33, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

			:Hi, I noticed you released this code into the public domain. Just wanted to say that I have no problem releasing the changes I made also into the public domain as well. I'm pretty flexible about license but others may not so take care in the future; at least give them some warning on the talk page. -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka\|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka\|contribs]])</small></sup> 17:48, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Strife Onizuka: /* Hierarchics */

2009-05-06T23:34:21Z

Hierarchics

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:34, 6 May 2009
Line 21:		Line 21:
	* Add: Re-enabled Link_HierarchicsGet		* Add: Re-enabled Link_HierarchicsGet
	* Fix: In edit mode the (ChangedRot && ChangedPos) code is dead due to preceding logic... and inconsistent with preceding code.		* Fix: In edit mode the (ChangedRot && ChangedPos) code is dead due to preceding logic... and inconsistent with preceding code.
	-- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka\|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka\|contribs]])</small></sup> 23:33, 6 May 2009 (UTC)		-- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka\|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka\|contribs]])</small></sup> 23:33, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Strife Onizuka: /* Hierarchics */ new section

2009-05-06T23:33:53Z

Hierarchics: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:33, 6 May 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:Thank you. That is so much better! -- [[User:Strife Onizuka\|Strife Onizuka]] 00:15, 8 May 2008 (PDT)		:Thank you. That is so much better! -- [[User:Strife Onizuka\|Strife Onizuka]] 00:15, 8 May 2008 (PDT)

			== [[Hierarchics]] ==

			I've been poking at [[Hierarchics]] and I have been making some tweaks to it but they aren't why I'm posting. The reason I'm writing this is: CheckValidity. I don't think as a public script it needs or benefits from CheckValidity, in fact it is detrimental. As the script is currently written, CheckValidity isn't called until the object is rezzed or the inventory changes. The problem is that CheckValidity wasn't designed to work with 3rd party creators, the only creators it cares about are the hard coded ones.

			So here is what will happen, a third party will try to use the script and it will work, but when they rerez the object, it will self destruct. The user won't know what happened and unless they read the script carefully, they won't know that they need to change the Developer keys.

			Personally, it makes me uneasy to see hard coded UUIDs especially when they are granted special privileges over my script ("my" in the sense that it's in my object doing my bidding). It makes me even more uneasy when I don't know who they are. Some comments there would have been good.

			I've done you the favor and remove the CheckValidity functionality from the script. I couldn't imaging you wanting people IMing you with "Your script killed my object!"

			P.S. Here is a list of changes I've made:
			* Add: Ref now supports quaternions
			* Fix: Ref does not support <0,0,0>
			* Fix: Collision between Link_HierarchicsGet and Link_HierarchicsEdit
			* Add: Re-enabled Link_HierarchicsGet
			* Fix: In edit mode the (ChangedRot && ChangedPos) code is dead due to preceding logic... and inconsistent with preceding code.
			-- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka\|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka\|contribs]])</small></sup> 23:33, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Strife Onizuka at 07:15, 8 May 2008

2008-05-08T07:15:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:15, 8 May 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:

	You made a good start but doesn't really help people know what Pn, Pd, O, etc are? I hate to say this but single and double letter variable names are out of fashion these days. Not that we are style crazy here on the wiki (far from it, you will see a diverse range of code styles here on the wiki) but lines have to be drawn somewhere. -- [[User:Strife Onizuka\|Strife Onizuka]] 20:20, 7 May 2008 (PDT)		You made a good start but doesn't really help people know what Pn, Pd, O, etc are? I hate to say this but single and double letter variable names are out of fashion these days. Not that we are style crazy here on the wiki (far from it, you will see a diverse range of code styles here on the wiki) but lines have to be drawn somewhere. -- [[User:Strife Onizuka\|Strife Onizuka]] 20:20, 7 May 2008 (PDT)

			:Thank you. That is so much better! -- [[User:Strife Onizuka\|Strife Onizuka]] 00:15, 8 May 2008 (PDT)

Strife Onizuka at 03:25, 8 May 2008

2008-05-08T03:25:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:25, 7 May 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I've been going through your Geometric Library, could you give the parameter names for the functions meaningful descriptions? The single and double letter parameter names just don't convey enough information about how the functions are supposed to be used. -- [[User:Strife Onizuka\|Strife Onizuka]] 15:09, 5 May 2008 (PDT)		I've been going through your Geometric Library, could you give the parameter names for the functions meaningful descriptions? The single and double letter parameter names just don't convey enough information about how the functions are supposed to be used. -- [[User:Strife Onizuka\|Strife Onizuka]] 15:09, 5 May 2008 (PDT)

	You made a good start but doesn't really help people know what Pn, Pd, O, etc are? I hate to say this ~~but~~ but single and double letter variable names are ~~really~~ out of fashion these days. -- [[User:Strife Onizuka\|Strife Onizuka]] 20:20, 7 May 2008 (PDT)		You made a good start but doesn't really help people know what Pn, Pd, O, etc are? I hate to say this but single and double letter variable names are out of fashion these days. Not that we are style crazy here on the wiki (far from it, you will see a diverse range of code styles here on the wiki) but lines have to be drawn somewhere. -- [[User:Strife Onizuka\|Strife Onizuka]] 20:20, 7 May 2008 (PDT)

Strife Onizuka at 03:20, 8 May 2008

2008-05-08T03:20:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:20, 7 May 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I've been going through your Geometric Library, could you give the parameter names for the functions meaningful descriptions? The single and double letter parameter names just don't convey enough information about how the functions are supposed to be used. -- [[User:Strife Onizuka\|Strife Onizuka]] 15:09, 5 May 2008 (PDT)		I've been going through your Geometric Library, could you give the parameter names for the functions meaningful descriptions? The single and double letter parameter names just don't convey enough information about how the functions are supposed to be used. -- [[User:Strife Onizuka\|Strife Onizuka]] 15:09, 5 May 2008 (PDT)

			You made a good start but doesn't really help people know what Pn, Pd, O, etc are? I hate to say this but but single and double letter variable names are really out of fashion these days. -- [[User:Strife Onizuka\|Strife Onizuka]] 20:20, 7 May 2008 (PDT)

Strife Onizuka at 22:09, 5 May 2008

2008-05-05T22:09:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:09, 5 May 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I've been going through your Geometric Library, could you give the parameter names for the functions meaningful descriptions? The single and double letter parameter names just don't convey enough information about how the ~~function is~~ supposed to be used. -- [[User:Strife Onizuka\|Strife Onizuka]] 15:09, 5 May 2008 (PDT)		I've been going through your Geometric Library, could you give the parameter names for the functions meaningful descriptions? The single and double letter parameter names just don't convey enough information about how the functions are supposed to be used. -- [[User:Strife Onizuka\|Strife Onizuka]] 15:09, 5 May 2008 (PDT)