Difference between revisions of "Talk:LSL Protocol/Restrained Love Open Relay Group/simwide"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Satomi Ahn (talk | contribs) (Created page with "I have an alternate suggestion. Instead of doing something like !x-simwide|@getstuff=1234, (whose answer should be listened for on a new listener on channel 1234), why not go fo…") |
Satomi Ahn (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Typical conversation | Typical conversation | ||
C -> R: outfit_query,!x-forward/getoutfit | C -> R: outfit_query,!x-forward/getoutfit | ||
C <- R: outfit_query,!x-forward/getoutfit,110010011111 | C <- R: outfit_query,!x-forward/getoutfit,110010011111 | ||
I believe my approach is more versatile (works whatever is the actual communication type) and easier to use (no need to listen to another channel). | I believe my approach is more versatile (works whatever is the actual communication type) and easier to use (no need to listen to another channel). | ||
Revision as of 01:22, 9 June 2011
I have an alternate suggestion.
Instead of doing something like !x-simwide|@getstuff=1234, (whose answer should be listened for on a new listener on channel 1234), why not go for !x-forward/getstuff, which the relay would answer on the relay channel (or whatever mean of communication was negociated before between relay and furniture)?
Typical conversation
C -> R: outfit_query,!x-forward/getoutfit C <- R: outfit_query,!x-forward/getoutfit,110010011111
I believe my approach is more versatile (works whatever is the actual communication type) and easier to use (no need to listen to another channel).
What do you think?
--Satomi Ahn 02:21, 9 June 2011 (PDT)