Difference between revisions of "Talk:LlListStatistics"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Joris Tolsen (talk | contribs) m (for statement should have < in stead of >) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
You are correct, it should be a float return, I've looked it up to confirm it. Not sure at what step I made the mistake. Good catch. [[User:Strife Onizuka|Strife Onizuka]] 13:17, 23 February 2007 (PST) | You are correct, it should be a float return, I've looked it up to confirm it. Not sure at what step I made the mistake. Good catch. [[User:Strife Onizuka|Strife Onizuka]] 13:17, 23 February 2007 (PST) | ||
:Just looked at the source, the tooltip for llListStatistics is wrong. [[User:Strife Onizuka|Strife Onizuka]] | :Just looked at the source, the tooltip for llListStatistics is wrong. {{Jira|VWR-148}} [[User:Strife Onizuka|Strife Onizuka]] | ||
For the example to work as expected the for statement should read : if(3 < ++ticks). | |||
Now it stops working when there is enough information gathered to make sense. [[User:Joris Tolsen|Joris Tolsen]] 08:36, 9 August 2014 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:36, 9 August 2014
I can only get this function to compile by assuming it returns a float. That actually makes sense because the list can store numbers as floats. Accordingly I've changed the return type.
Wilder Vallejo 12:23, 23 February 2007 (PST)
You are correct, it should be a float return, I've looked it up to confirm it. Not sure at what step I made the mistake. Good catch. Strife Onizuka 13:17, 23 February 2007 (PST)
- Just looked at the source, the tooltip for llListStatistics is wrong. VWR-148 Strife Onizuka
For the example to work as expected the for statement should read : if(3 < ++ticks). Now it stops working when there is enough information gathered to make sense. Joris Tolsen 08:36, 9 August 2014 (PDT)