Difference between revisions of "User:Opensource Obscure"

From Second Life Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 14: Line 14:
* Forgetting to leave an edit summary.
* Forgetting to leave an edit summary.
* Making too many edits than are needed when a single edit would suffice also needlessly fills up the ''edit history'', ''[[Special:Recentchanges|Recent Changes]]'' and ''[[Special:Watchlist|Watch List]]'' pages.
* Making too many edits than are needed when a single edit would suffice also needlessly fills up the ''edit history'', ''[[Special:Recentchanges|Recent Changes]]'' and ''[[Special:Watchlist|Watch List]]'' pages.
== to do ==
* Is the crash-report tool currently working on Linux? if yes - in which releases? all of them?
** it's supposed to
* Is it OK to add [https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Talk:Source_branches branches description draft] below the current content at [[Source_branches]] ?
** y
* Is really useful to LL (as stated on the wiki) when residents download sources from SVN, try to build them and report errors?
** y
* Which branches are/will be the most useful ones to test?
** trunk; release candidate
* Is it ok to add a reference to these Office Hours the Open Source [[Participating]] page ?
** y
* Is it ok to add a reference to Nightly Builds / Battery Street Irregulars project and mailing list to [[Downloading_test_builds]] page?


<BR>
<BR>
{{Jira Reporter}}
{{Jira Reporter}}
{{ISO 639-3/cat-speaking|ita}}
{{ISO 639-3/cat-speaking|ita}}

Revision as of 16:43, 20 November 2008

About Me


Memo: Wiki Common Mistakes

  • Correcting a spelling/grammar error and not marking the edit as minor.
  • Committing an edit without previewing it, then having to make another edit to correct something.
  • Making individual edits to several sections of an article, when a single edit would be sufficient.
  • Forgetting to leave an edit summary.
  • Making too many edits than are needed when a single edit would suffice also needlessly fills up the edit history, Recent Changes and Watch List pages.

to do

  • Is the crash-report tool currently working on Linux? if yes - in which releases? all of them?
    • it's supposed to
  • Is it OK to add branches description draft below the current content at Source_branches ?
    • y
  • Is really useful to LL (as stated on the wiki) when residents download sources from SVN, try to build them and report errors?
    • y
  • Which branches are/will be the most useful ones to test?
    • trunk; release candidate
  • Is it ok to add a reference to these Office Hours the Open Source Participating page ?
    • y
  • Is it ok to add a reference to Nightly Builds / Battery Street Irregulars project and mailing list to Downloading_test_builds page?


View the issues Opensource Obscure has filed at jira.secondlife.com