Difference between revisions of "Talk:Efficiency Tester"

Revision as of 06:53, 20 October 2007

Talk:Hex suggests that we should tweak this instrument to call llGetTime rather than llGetTimestamp, in order to more accurately measure elapsed run time whenever llGetRegionTimeDilation is not exactly 1.

Change complete! The run time cost of the harness may have dropped to below 0.5 milliseconds. -- Ppaatt Lynagh 07:53, 20 October 2007 (PDT)

Revision as of 20:40, 19 October 2007 (view source) Ppaatt Lynagh (talk \| contribs) (Talk:Hex suggests that we should tweak this instrument to call llGetTime rather than llGetTimestamp, in order to more accurately measure elapsed run time when time dilates)		Revision as of 06:53, 20 October 2007 (view source) Ppaatt Lynagh (talk \| contribs) (Change complete! The run time cost of the harness may have dropped to below 0.5 milliseconds. -- ~~~~) Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Talk:Hex]] suggests that we should tweak this instrument to call [[llGetTime]] rather than [[llGetTimestamp]], in order to more accurately measure elapsed run time whenever [[llGetRegionTimeDilation]] is not exactly 1.		[[Talk:Hex]] suggests that we should tweak this instrument to call [[llGetTime]] rather than [[llGetTimestamp]], in order to more accurately measure elapsed run time whenever [[llGetRegionTimeDilation]] is not exactly 1.

			Change complete! The run time cost of the harness may have dropped to below 0.5 milliseconds. -- [[User:Ppaatt Lynagh\|Ppaatt Lynagh]] 07:53, 20 October 2007 (PDT)