Difference between revisions of "User talk:Tid Kidd"
(New section: Age Play does not equate to Child Porn) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[[User:SignpostMarv Martin|SignpostMarv Martin]] 00:12, 9 February 2008 (PST) | [[User:SignpostMarv Martin|SignpostMarv Martin]] 00:12, 9 February 2008 (PST) | ||
Can I ask anyone else leaving comments on my wiki page to observe a few simple courtesies please? (1) if it is not to do with this wiki page then it doesn't really belong here, and you should IM me inworld or drop me a notecard and (2) to speak to me with some measure of respect and friendliness. I'm sure I don't really need to say this to most people, I'm just rather shocked by the previous contribution, is all. | |||
Revision as of 14:54, 11 February 2008
Thank-you for improving the Snapshot tips page!
Tid, I don't think we've talked before, but I was looking at the page revision history, and thanks for your corrections. I appreciate the open editing that comes with this wiki, and graciously appreciate the time you spent bettering the guide to be more correct and useful to Residents at large. --Torley Linden 18:41, 14 November 2007 (PST)
Age Play does not equate to Child Porn
I reverted[1] your poorly worded edit to Help:Second Life FAQ.
Age Play does not equate to child porn, Residents whose avatars appear child-like do not all engage in child porn-related activities, to claim on behalf of all Second Life Residents that child-like avatars are not tolerated is in of itself intolerant and prejudicial.
SignpostMarv Martin 00:12, 9 February 2008 (PST)
Can I ask anyone else leaving comments on my wiki page to observe a few simple courtesies please? (1) if it is not to do with this wiki page then it doesn't really belong here, and you should IM me inworld or drop me a notecard and (2) to speak to me with some measure of respect and friendliness. I'm sure I don't really need to say this to most people, I'm just rather shocked by the previous contribution, is all.