Difference between revisions of "User talk:Tid Kidd"
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Can I ask anyone else leaving comments on my wiki page to observe a few simple courtesies please? (1) if it is not to do with this wiki page then it doesn't really belong here, and you should IM me inworld or drop me a notecard and (2) to speak to me with some measure of respect and friendliness. I'm sure I don't really need to say this to most people, I'm just rather shocked by the previous contribution, is all. | Can I ask anyone else leaving comments on my wiki page to observe a few simple courtesies please? (1) if it is not to do with this wiki page then it doesn't really belong here, and you should IM me inworld or drop me a notecard and (2) to speak to me with some measure of respect and friendliness. I'm sure I don't really need to say this to most people, I'm just rather shocked by the previous contribution, is all. | ||
== re: Request for civility and courtesy befitting Mentor status == | |||
While the wording of my comments may seem a little harsh I can apologise for that, but I will not apologise for making them, nor for making them on your wiki talk page. | |||
Since there was no existing talk thread on the wiki article regarding the "age play" topic, and you were the sole contributor to the article with reference to "age play" within the second life FAQ, the most appropriate avenue for communication is your talk page, where you at least have the authority to delete messages you deem irrelevant or offensive. | |||
:[[User:SignpostMarv Martin|SignpostMarv Martin]] 03:17, 14 February 2008 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 03:17, 14 February 2008
Thank-you for improving the Snapshot tips page!
Tid, I don't think we've talked before, but I was looking at the page revision history, and thanks for your corrections. I appreciate the open editing that comes with this wiki, and graciously appreciate the time you spent bettering the guide to be more correct and useful to Residents at large. --Torley Linden 18:41, 14 November 2007 (PST)
Age Play does not equate to Child Porn
I reverted[1] your poorly worded edit to Help:Second Life FAQ.
Age Play does not equate to child porn, Residents whose avatars appear child-like do not all engage in child porn-related activities, to claim on behalf of all Second Life Residents that child-like avatars are not tolerated is in of itself intolerant and prejudicial.
SignpostMarv Martin 00:12, 9 February 2008 (PST)
Can I ask anyone else leaving comments on my wiki page to observe a few simple courtesies please? (1) if it is not to do with this wiki page then it doesn't really belong here, and you should IM me inworld or drop me a notecard and (2) to speak to me with some measure of respect and friendliness. I'm sure I don't really need to say this to most people, I'm just rather shocked by the previous contribution, is all.
re: Request for civility and courtesy befitting Mentor status
While the wording of my comments may seem a little harsh I can apologise for that, but I will not apologise for making them, nor for making them on your wiki talk page. Since there was no existing talk thread on the wiki article regarding the "age play" topic, and you were the sole contributor to the article with reference to "age play" within the second life FAQ, the most appropriate avenue for communication is your talk page, where you at least have the authority to delete messages you deem irrelevant or offensive.
- SignpostMarv Martin 03:17, 14 February 2008 (PST)