Difference between revisions of "Talk:LSL Function Style"

From Second Life Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(91 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Coding Standards?==
== Old Talk ==
Is there going to be any debate regarding the use of CamelCase, javaCase, or coding standards? Thoughts? Opinions? Flames >> /dev/null [[User:Talarus Luan|Talarus Luan]] 18:28, 24 January 2007 (PST)


:Use the style guide from the old wiki [[User:Gigs Taggart|Gigs Taggart]] 15:38, 25 January 2007 (PST)
[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}/Original Design Discussions]] -- All the conversations we had when things were first being made. Much of it not applicable since the style morphed to include some of the presented concerns.
::Anyone wanna volunteer to write our own sanitized version of that? ;) [[User:Talarus Luan|Talarus Luan]] 19:03, 25 January 2007 (PST)


== Specification ==
== Style ==
<div style="padding: 0.5em">
returns random number in range [0,mag)
{|
|-
| [[LSL_Energy|Energy]]:
| 10.0
|-
| [[LSL_Sleep|Sleep]]:
| 0.0
|-
| [[LSL_Function_ID|Function ID]]:
| 8
|}
</div>
[[User:Dimentox Travanti|Dimentox Travanti]] 08:09, 25 January 2007 (PST)


:Now is the time if you want me to change the formating of that table, i've already generated the tables for all 328 functions. [[User:Strife Onizuka|Strife Onizuka]] 10:46, 25 January 2007 (PST)
There has been some discussion on Jira about the style and the writing and it's been suggested that the style could use some tweaking. Since it's been over a year I thought it would be a great idea if we took the time to discuss the shortfalls and successes of the style along with any new ideas. What ever is decided I'll endeavor to implement be that a small rework or an entire refit. -- [[User:Strife Onizuka|Strife Onizuka]] 07:08, 17 May 2008 (PDT)
:Actually Looks good with that.. [[User:Dimentox Travanti|Dimentox Travanti]] 10:53, 25 January 2007 (PST)


== Looks good ==
==Deep Notes==


Seems to work well. it flows, and concise info.
Deeps notes would be an section with advanced information about implementations, specifications, and highly technical details; not to mention tracking the history of the function and the state of specific bugs.
[[User:Dimentox Travanti|Dimentox Travanti]] 08:11, 25 January 2007 (PST)
 
== Helper Functions ==
I added a "Helper Function" section, these are a bit like examples, but are complete functions that encapsulate or use the function in question.
If they had pages to themselves they would be linked through "See Also"[[User:Strife Onizuka|Strife Onizuka]] 10:50, 25 January 2007 (PST)
 
== Short Description ==
I didn't see much point to the short description. That sort of thing really belongs in the specification section.
 
== Templates? ==
I see that MediaWiki supports some kind of templating system. Is there a way we can use it to define a template for this page type and parameterize the content to it? Would make it easy later to change the template instead of changing hundreds of function pages. Probably can use this for all of the page types which will specify a standardized format for more than a handful of pages.
[[User:Talarus Luan|Talarus Luan]] 11:03, 25 January 2007 (PST)
:I have made up a test template for functions, hence: [[Template:LSL_Function]] [[User:Talarus Luan|Talarus Luan]] 12:44, 25 January 2007 (PST)
 
Creating it as a template is a good idea.  And parts can be sub-templated out.
--[[User:Thraxis Epsilon|Thraxis Epsilon]] 12:51, 25 January 2007 (PST)
:Please feel free to attack it; you've got a lot more experience than me, as I'm rather new at this MediaWiki stuff. :P [[User:Talarus Luan|Talarus Luan]] 14:17, 25 January 2007 (PST)
 
The template is looking really good. What about moving the "See also" section down below the "Notes" section? [[User:Talarus Luan|Talarus Luan]] 19:05, 25 January 2007 (PST)
 
:I was thinking of doing that, I will do it now. [[User:Strife Onizuka|Strife Onizuka]] 23:48, 25 January 2007 (PST)
 
Oh I should have said earlier, I've made a template, and I've just finished making stub pages for ever single function. Your template  seems to be based on an earlier version of mine (while i was playing with the first pages it was under heave development)[[User:Strife Onizuka|Strife Onizuka]] 23:46, 25 January 2007 (PST)
:Well, I started out with something from scratch, based on the experimental page layout at the time, and Thraxis has been updating and trying some things using your Specification Template. It looks like he is having a problem doing conditionals in Template parameter passing, so I don't know if we can get away with it or not. Look at an earlier revision of that page for the one I originally created. It was designed to do the whole page, though I am not sure if that is the best way to attack it or not. [[User:Talarus Luan|Talarus Luan]] 23:55, 25 January 2007 (PST)
:Couple more things: Was it wise creating stub pages already? I was under the impression that someone was looking into getting the LSL namespace assigned for us to use. Will that affect the page locations? IE, would they need to all be moved? Also, your template has a minor grammatical issue in the return value specification. If the return type is "integer", it reads "Returns a integer". Can you conditionally select a word based on the value of a parameter being a specific value? I couldn't find any doc on the #if conditional anywhere myself. [[User:Talarus Luan|Talarus Luan]] 00:10, 26 January 2007 (PST)
:*grumbles* I was hoping nobody would notice that, yes it can be fixed, it's a bit of a hack (I'll see what i can do; hopefully I'll be able to pick off the first character and compare it otherwise it will be a comparison for just integers ~_~). If we did get the LSL namespace, we would have problems with forced leading caps. About the #if documentation, I spent a few hours experimenting. I personally don't mind having to append LSL_ to the front of pages, good place to use a template. [[User:Strife Onizuka|Strife Onizuka]] 01:08, 26 January 2007 (PST)

Latest revision as of 06:11, 17 May 2008

Old Talk

Talk:LSL Function Style/Original Design Discussions -- All the conversations we had when things were first being made. Much of it not applicable since the style morphed to include some of the presented concerns.

Style

There has been some discussion on Jira about the style and the writing and it's been suggested that the style could use some tweaking. Since it's been over a year I thought it would be a great idea if we took the time to discuss the shortfalls and successes of the style along with any new ideas. What ever is decided I'll endeavor to implement be that a small rework or an entire refit. -- Strife Onizuka 07:08, 17 May 2008 (PDT)

Deep Notes

Deeps notes would be an section with advanced information about implementations, specifications, and highly technical details; not to mention tracking the history of the function and the state of specific bugs.

Retrieved from "https://wiki.secondlife.com/w/index.php?title=Talk:LSL_Function_Style&oldid=67774"