Difference between revisions of "Talk:Conditionals"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Clang Bailey (talk | contribs) (New page: Not so important, actually. This style makes for less readable code. I'd rather see "case" conditional added before C style conditionals.) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Not so important, actually. This style makes for less readable code. I'd rather see "case" conditional added before C style conditionals. | Not so important, actually. This style makes for less readable code. I'd rather see "case" conditional added before C style conditionals. --[[User:Clang Bailey|Clang Bailey]] 16:48, 19 December 2007 (PST) | ||
You can already do such a thing with regular LSL: | |||
<lsl>llSay(1, "This is " + llList2String(["false", "true"], (a == 0)) );</lsl> | |||
--[[User:Kaluura Boa|Kaluura Boa]] | |||
:Your workaround is very expensive (it requires a lot of bytecode). To implement the request is actually quite easy. -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka|contribs]])</small></sup> 12:41, 6 September 2008 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 11:41, 6 September 2008
Not so important, actually. This style makes for less readable code. I'd rather see "case" conditional added before C style conditionals. --Clang Bailey 16:48, 19 December 2007 (PST)
You can already do such a thing with regular LSL: <lsl>llSay(1, "This is " + llList2String(["false", "true"], (a == 0)) );</lsl> --Kaluura Boa