Difference between revisions of "Template talk:JiraIssue"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Is this needed?) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Is this template needed? We've had the [[Template:Issue|Issue]] template for years for precisely this purpose.<br/>-- '''[[User:Haravikk_Mistral|Haravikk]]''' <sup><small>([[User_talk:Haravikk_Mistral|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Haravikk_Mistral|contribs]])</small></sup> 08:03, 20 April 2011 (PDT) | Is this template needed? We've had the [[Template:Issue|Issue]] template for years for precisely this purpose.<br/>-- '''[[User:Haravikk_Mistral|Haravikk]]''' <sup><small>([[User_talk:Haravikk_Mistral|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Haravikk_Mistral|contribs]])</small></sup> 08:03, 20 April 2011 (PDT) | ||
:It's not needed, everyone just uses [[Template:Jira]] instead. -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka|contribs]])</small></sup> 10:26, 20 April 2011 (PDT) | |||
::I think it might be nice if one or both of these was connected to a template based on [[Template:Issue]], so we can get a similar format with support for type/resolution etc., but in a format that it's includable without the use of a table (so it will work in lists), the format of [[Template:JiraIssue]] and [[Template:Jira]] should both be compatible with the format used for [[Template:Issue]] if I'm not mistaken? I might take a stab at porting some bits of [[Template:Issue]], but I'm really not much good with the logic stuff in templates, I think it's all those damnable curly brackets =)<br/>-- '''[[User:Haravikk_Mistral|Haravikk]]''' <sup><small>([[User_talk:Haravikk_Mistral|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Haravikk_Mistral|contribs]])</small></sup> 03:10, 21 April 2011 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:10, 21 April 2011
Is this needed?
Is this template needed? We've had the Issue template for years for precisely this purpose.
-- Haravikk (talk|contribs) 08:03, 20 April 2011 (PDT)
- It's not needed, everyone just uses Template:Jira instead. -- Strife (talk|contribs) 10:26, 20 April 2011 (PDT)
- I think it might be nice if one or both of these was connected to a template based on Template:Issue, so we can get a similar format with support for type/resolution etc., but in a format that it's includable without the use of a table (so it will work in lists), the format of Template:JiraIssue and Template:Jira should both be compatible with the format used for Template:Issue if I'm not mistaken? I might take a stab at porting some bits of Template:Issue, but I'm really not much good with the logic stuff in templates, I think it's all those damnable curly brackets =)
-- Haravikk (talk|contribs) 03:10, 21 April 2011 (PDT)
- I think it might be nice if one or both of these was connected to a template based on Template:Issue, so we can get a similar format with support for type/resolution etc., but in a format that it's includable without the use of a table (so it will work in lists), the format of Template:JiraIssue and Template:Jira should both be compatible with the format used for Template:Issue if I'm not mistaken? I might take a stab at porting some bits of Template:Issue, but I'm really not much good with the logic stuff in templates, I think it's all those damnable curly brackets =)