Difference between revisions of "Category talk:LSL Face"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Face Table update suggestion) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| 7 || path cut end | | 7 || path cut end | ||
|} | |} | ||
==TABLE OF FACE NUMBERS == | |||
This page says a lot without saying anything of immediate use, it puts the burden on the reader to do a lot of deductive reasoning to figure out what the face numbers should be rather than presenting an easy to use table that gives the face numbers to expect for all situations. IMHO this page is totally useless for most people.[[User:IntLibber Brautigan|IntLibber Brautigan]] 20:24, 18 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
: I'm having trouble figuring out exactly how you want the article improved. If you could provide an example of how a section of the table should look, I might be able to use deductive reasoning and apply your ideas to the entire table but right now, you haven't given me anything of immediate use. -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka|contribs]])</small></sup> 08:07, 21 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:07, 21 June 2009
The face table is missing -y, throwing the rest of the table out of sequence. I believe this table is correct, but the +/- I came up with do not seem to match the existing table at all. Can someone else verify this?
| 0 | top (+z) |
| 1 | -x |
| 2 | -y |
| 3 | +x |
| 4 | +y |
| 5 | bottom (-z) |
| 6 | path cut begin |
| 7 | path cut end |
TABLE OF FACE NUMBERS
This page says a lot without saying anything of immediate use, it puts the burden on the reader to do a lot of deductive reasoning to figure out what the face numbers should be rather than presenting an easy to use table that gives the face numbers to expect for all situations. IMHO this page is totally useless for most people.IntLibber Brautigan 20:24, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- I'm having trouble figuring out exactly how you want the article improved. If you could provide an example of how a section of the table should look, I might be able to use deductive reasoning and apply your ideas to the entire table but right now, you haven't given me anything of immediate use. -- Strife (talk|contribs) 08:07, 21 June 2009 (UTC)