Difference between revisions of "User talk:Ramzi Linden"
(Appreciate the effort to rework the tooltips but don't destroy the wiki in the process) |
Ramzi Linden (talk | contribs) m |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Can you explain why you have removed all the useful data from the caveats section of [[llGetAgentSize]] regarding how to establish a more accurate height of id? -- [[File:Eddy_CUBE_jpg.jpg|45px|link=User:EddyFragment Robonaught]]'''[[User:EddyFragment Robonaught|Eddy]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:EddyFragment_Robonaught|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/EddyFragment_Robonaught|contribs]])</small></sup> 21:28, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | Can you explain why you have removed all the useful data from the caveats section of [[llGetAgentSize]] regarding how to establish a more accurate height of id? -- [[File:Eddy_CUBE_jpg.jpg|45px|link=User:EddyFragment Robonaught]]'''[[User:EddyFragment Robonaught|Eddy]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:EddyFragment_Robonaught|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/EddyFragment_Robonaught|contribs]])</small></sup> 21:28, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
Hi Eddy, I didn't remove it, I moved it up more prominently. Take a look at the diff for my revision: https://wiki.secondlife.com/w/index.php?title=LlGetAgentSize&diff=498272&oldid=488312 [[User:Ramzi Linden|Ramzi Linden]] 22:33, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
I'm sooo sorry Ramzi. I looked and looked and couldn't find it. I must have had a memory fuse blow out cause I could have sworn the block of info about getting the "true" size was at the top before. I saw you'd moved the caveat but didn't realize... *slaps own head*. Please don't think me rude. I made a mistake. Although now thinking about it... Would it not be better to have the full info within the caveats section? It is after all quite important to note that [[llGetAgentSize]] doesn't return the agents size *lolz*. Really am sorry (I'm not such an ass as I may seem; just over worked and brittle). -- [[File:Eddy_CUBE_jpg.jpg|45px|link=User:EddyFragment Robonaught]]'''[[User:EddyFragment Robonaught|Eddy]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:EddyFragment_Robonaught|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/EddyFragment_Robonaught|contribs]])</small></sup> 01:39, 30 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
:I'm inclined to agree about moving the footnote into the caveat; the problem is nobody can agree on the right method of determining the correct size. There is too much contention over it {{HoverText|IMO|In My Opinion - used to subtract weight from the argument just made}}. -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka|contribs]])</small></sup> 15:50, 30 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Hi Eddy, don't worry, no offense taken! In fact if I ever make a mistake, I would hope and expect that people would revert my change. Likewise I will go ahead and promote the footnote as well; I had the same inclination when I first saw it that it should not be buried. In general I think we should be more aggressive about improving the existing wiki, after all that is how it evolves and strengthens. [[User:Ramzi Linden|Ramzi Linden]] 17:15, 30 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:15, 30 September 2009
Hiya Ramzi.
Can you explain why you have removed all the useful data from the caveats section of llGetAgentSize regarding how to establish a more accurate height of id? -- 
Eddy (talk|contribs) 21:28, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi Eddy, I didn't remove it, I moved it up more prominently. Take a look at the diff for my revision: https://wiki.secondlife.com/w/index.php?title=LlGetAgentSize&diff=498272&oldid=488312 Ramzi Linden 22:33, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
I'm sooo sorry Ramzi. I looked and looked and couldn't find it. I must have had a memory fuse blow out cause I could have sworn the block of info about getting the "true" size was at the top before. I saw you'd moved the caveat but didn't realize... *slaps own head*. Please don't think me rude. I made a mistake. Although now thinking about it... Would it not be better to have the full info within the caveats section? It is after all quite important to note that llGetAgentSize doesn't return the agents size *lolz*. Really am sorry (I'm not such an ass as I may seem; just over worked and brittle). -- Eddy (talk|contribs) 01:39, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- I'm inclined to agree about moving the footnote into the caveat; the problem is nobody can agree on the right method of determining the correct size. There is too much contention over it IMO. -- Strife (talk|contribs) 15:50, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Hi Eddy, don't worry, no offense taken! In fact if I ever make a mistake, I would hope and expect that people would revert my change. Likewise I will go ahead and promote the footnote as well; I had the same inclination when I first saw it that it should not be buried. In general I think we should be more aggressive about improving the existing wiki, after all that is how it evolves and strengthens. Ramzi Linden 17:15, 30 September 2009 (UTC)