Difference between revisions of "User talk:Char Linden"

From Second Life Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Reply: new section)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== re: Linden removal ==
== Reply ==


Hi Char- rather than blanking the pages, could you use your sysop perms to delete the page ?
Were you blanking the page because you felt the issue that was brought to light had been dealt with? I would greatly appreciate any light you can shed on this. I want to be on the same page with you. -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka|contribs]])</small></sup> 05:38, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 
Blanking the article unfortunately does not remove the article from the wiki, so unless there is some need to keep the article history around, deletion is usually preferred.
 
 
[[User:SignpostMarv Martin|SignpostMarv Martin]] 04:53, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 
:Why are you removing the pages of (past?) Lindens? Wouldn't it be better to update them to say they are no longer Lindens? The pages may contain information that is of historic interest to future generations. Deleting content should be reserved for situations where the content is objectionable, or libel (or other legal reason). I can understand not wanting to confuse users with bad content but this comes off more like corporate politics. Using the wiki to forward corporate politics undermines any semblance of the impartiality of LL and devalues the contributions of the users. Content manipulation for personal/corporate gain is largely viewed as unethical. It is counter productive to community building. This is a little thing, a minor thing, like a rain drop. Keep in mind, floods are made of rain drops. -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka|contribs]])</small></sup> 16:28, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:38, 14 May 2010

Reply

Were you blanking the page because you felt the issue that was brought to light had been dealt with? I would greatly appreciate any light you can shed on this. I want to be on the same page with you. -- Strife (talk|contribs) 05:38, 15 May 2010 (UTC)