Difference between revisions of "User talk:ANSI Soderstrom/Simple LSL Array (Associative)"
m (moved User talk:ANSI Soderstrom/Simple LSL Array to User talk:ANSI Soderstrom/Simple LSL Array (Associative): better Description of the entire code) |
m (→Answers) |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
;Question : Why are you supporting multiple values for a key? It looks like you only return the last one with GET. PUT updates all of them which sorta makes having them pointless.<br /> | ;Question : Why are you supporting multiple values for a key? It looks like you only return the last one with GET. PUT updates all of them which sorta makes having them pointless.<br /> | ||
;Answer : I dont support multiple Values for a Key. I allow only one Value (per Type) per Key. But its the posibillity that a KEY can have the same spelling like a VALUE<br /> | ;Answer : I dont support multiple Values for a Key. I allow only one Value (per Type) per Key. But its the posibillity that a KEY can have the same spelling like a VALUE<br /> | ||
:e.g. TEST3 = KEY1 / | :e.g. TEST3 = KEY1 / FAIL1 = TEST2 / FAIL2 = TEST1 / TEST2 = TEST1 / KEY1 = TEST2<br /> | ||
:^^^try to get the right values with your GET-Method and u will see what i mean ;) | :^^^try to get the right values with your GET-Method and u will see what i mean ;) | ||
Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
:...if u can post some examples with your functions. | :...if u can post some examples with your functions. | ||
[[User:ANSI Soderstrom|ANSI Soderstrom]] 06:20, 23 April 2010 (UTC) | [[User:ANSI Soderstrom|ANSI Soderstrom]] 06:20, 23 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
# It doesn't work? It should be handling the Key-Value confusion (though I was really tired when I wrote it). I'll see if I can get it working properly tomorrow. | |||
# Good job on the ERASE function. | |||
# wasn't looking to win. :-/ | |||
# hmmmm.... | |||
#* I'll work on commenting it (I find comments distracting when I have internalized the code). | |||
#* Do you mind if I just retool your examples? | |||
-- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka|contribs]])</small></sup> 05:28, 25 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
;4 | |||
:Uh Oh. No, please get me wrong. Often i would talk with other sentences but my Translator isn´t really a advantage. So i have to write other words (and sentences) as i want. I mind nothing... Iam happy for all comments on my different wiki-sites and i don´t want to be rude. Iam sorry about my angular-ism :) For 3 years ago i can´t speak any whole english-spelling sentence (at this point a BIG TYVM to LL for this 'low-cost interactive and very much fun-making language learning system' called SecondLife or 'LCIVMFMLLS'), please give me 3 years again and we can joking about our mothers without any trouble or double thinking.... ;) | |||
;3 | |||
:Maybe. But u are right. So i have moved this site to prevent further confusings. Head up! It´s all well ;) | |||
;2 | |||
:This is the first time in my whole live that i hear this sentence. What it means ? O.o U are kidding me, not ? | |||
;1 | |||
:No, it doesn´t work. And exact THIS behavior and confusing was the reason for writing the whole "Associative Array". :) | |||
[[User:ANSI Soderstrom|ANSI Soderstrom]] 14:24, 25 April 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 07:26, 25 April 2010
Thoughts
- Why are you supporting multiple values for a key? It looks like you only return the last one with GET. PUT updates all of them which sorta makes having them pointless.
- Where is the REMOVE function?
- This is not what I think of when i think of "array" nor a simple one at that, what you have here is an "
associative array".
-- Strife (talk|contribs) 06:24, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
A quick implementation
It's possible that it's not the best way to implement the loop condition. But it's clever. I've also added support for setting and removing multiple keys at a time. This is for convenience and there is little to no performance gain from doing this vs individual calls. I've checked the logic, it should work, I haven't tested it though. -- Strife (talk|contribs) 07:14, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
<lsl>list GET(list ARRAY, list KEY) {
if(llGetListLength(KEY) == 1) { integer position = llListFindList(ARRAY, KEY) + 1; if(position) { return llList2List(ARRAY, position, position); } } return [];
}
list PUT(list ARRAY, list KEY, list VALUE){
integer len = -llGetListLength(KEY); if(len == -llGetListLength(VALUE) && len) { integer position; do { list temp = []; list Key = llList2List(KEY, len, len); while((position & 1) == !(position = llListFindList(ARRAY, Key) + 1)) { temp = temp + llList2List(ARRAY, 0, position); ARRAY = llDeleteSubList(ARRAY, 0, position); } if(position) { ARRAY = temp + llListReplaceList(ARRAY, llList2List(VALUE, len, len), position, position); } else { ARRAY = temp + ARRAY + Key + llList2List(VALUE, len, len); } } while( ++len ); } return ARRAY;
}
list REMOVE(list ARRAY, list KEY){
integer len = -llGetListLength(KEY); if(len) { do { list temp = []; integer position; list Key = llList2List(KEY, len, len); while((position & 1) == !(position = llListFindList(ARRAY, Key) + 1)) { temp += llList2List(ARRAY, 0, position); ARRAY = llDeleteSubList(ARRAY, 0, position); } if(position) { ARRAY = temp + llDeleteSubList(ARRAY, position - 1, position); } else { ARRAY = temp + ARRAY; } } while( ++len ); } return ARRAY;
} </lsl> -- Strife (talk|contribs) 07:14, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Answers
Hi Strife. I expected you ;)
- Question
- Why are you supporting multiple values for a key? It looks like you only return the last one with GET. PUT updates all of them which sorta makes having them pointless.
- Answer
- I dont support multiple Values for a Key. I allow only one Value (per Type) per Key. But its the posibillity that a KEY can have the same spelling like a VALUE
- e.g. TEST3 = KEY1 / FAIL1 = TEST2 / FAIL2 = TEST1 / TEST2 = TEST1 / KEY1 = TEST2
- ^^^try to get the right values with your GET-Method and u will see what i mean ;)
- Question
- Where is the REMOVE function?
- Answer
- Uh Oh. Sorry. Simple LSL Array (Associative) updated !
- Question
- This is not what I think of when i think of "array" nor a simple one at that, what you have here is an "
associative array".
- Answer
- U win !
- It would be nice..
- ...if u can comment your code, then we can all reproduce what those lines exactly do.
- ...if u can post some examples with your functions.
ANSI Soderstrom 06:20, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
- It doesn't work? It should be handling the Key-Value confusion (though I was really tired when I wrote it). I'll see if I can get it working properly tomorrow.
- Good job on the ERASE function.
- wasn't looking to win. :-/
- hmmmm....
- I'll work on commenting it (I find comments distracting when I have internalized the code).
- Do you mind if I just retool your examples?
-- Strife (talk|contribs) 05:28, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
- 4
- Uh Oh. No, please get me wrong. Often i would talk with other sentences but my Translator isn´t really a advantage. So i have to write other words (and sentences) as i want. I mind nothing... Iam happy for all comments on my different wiki-sites and i don´t want to be rude. Iam sorry about my angular-ism :) For 3 years ago i can´t speak any whole english-spelling sentence (at this point a BIG TYVM to LL for this 'low-cost interactive and very much fun-making language learning system' called SecondLife or 'LCIVMFMLLS'), please give me 3 years again and we can joking about our mothers without any trouble or double thinking.... ;)
- 3
- Maybe. But u are right. So i have moved this site to prevent further confusings. Head up! It´s all well ;)
- 2
- This is the first time in my whole live that i hear this sentence. What it means ? O.o U are kidding me, not ?
- 1
- No, it doesn´t work. And exact THIS behavior and confusing was the reason for writing the whole "Associative Array". :)
ANSI Soderstrom 14:24, 25 April 2010 (UTC)