Difference between revisions of "Category talk:LSL Library"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→re: Rules for posting: response) |
|||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
::::** <nowiki>[[Category:Math| ]] [[Category:LSL Library|Math]]</nowiki> | ::::** <nowiki>[[Category:Math| ]] [[Category:LSL Library|Math]]</nowiki> | ||
::::[[User:SignpostMarv Martin|SignpostMarv Martin]] 11:15, 13 February 2007 (PST) | ::::[[User:SignpostMarv Martin|SignpostMarv Martin]] 11:15, 13 February 2007 (PST) | ||
::::: The wiki search does NOT search the USER namespace by default. It only searches the main namespace. This was one of the arguements used as to why an LSL: namespaces could not and should not be used. [[User:Thraxis Epsilon|Thraxis Epsilon]] 11:27, 13 February 2007 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 11:27, 13 February 2007
re: Rules for posting
Enforcing the "LSL Library" prefix "in order to keep the namespace clean" is kinda contradictory.
Keeping the articles in the creator's own user-space makes a whole lot more sense- see Resident's own pages in Resident's own user-spaces
SignpostMarv Martin 14:48, 12 February 2007 (PST)
- Doing that will remove those items from the search. I do not see that as an advantage. Thraxis Epsilon 15:45, 12 February 2007 (PST)
- No it wouldn't.
- Wiki search for llXorBase64StringsCorrect()
- Google Co-op search for llXorBase64StringsCorrect()
- Also:
- All the LSL Library scripts would be listed here.
- All the LSL Library scripts should be cross linked to other relevant sub categories.
- SignpostMarv Martin 07:00, 13 February 2007 (PST)
- I am loath to put library scripts into categories with built in functions. Since we are considering a pseudo-namespace specific to LSL (ie, LSL:) why not LSL Library: be considered? I seem to be less loath to having it included library scripts in categories with functions as a pseudo-namespace with a ":" then a " ". ":" provides a better separator. Strife Onizuka 08:30, 13 February 2007 (PST)
- You don't seem to have read WEB-22. We won't be using namespaces for LSL.
- Category structure demo:
- Category:LSL Functions
- subcats: Category:LSL Library, Category:Math, Category:Time, Category:Physics etc
- List of ll* functions
- Category:Math
- subcats: Category:LSL Library/Math
- List of LSL math functions
- [[Category:LSL Functions]]
- Category:LSL Library
- subcats: Category:LSL Library/Math, Category:LSL Library/Time, Category:LSL Library/Physics etc.
- list of library scripts needing to be categorised further
- [[Category:LSL Functions| ]] (to have the library listed at the top of the sub cat list)
- Category:LSL Library/Math
- list of LSL math library functions
- [[Category:Math| ]] [[Category:LSL Library|Math]]
- Category:LSL Functions
- SignpostMarv Martin 11:15, 13 February 2007 (PST)
- The wiki search does NOT search the USER namespace by default. It only searches the main namespace. This was one of the arguements used as to why an LSL: namespaces could not and should not be used. Thraxis Epsilon 11:27, 13 February 2007 (PST)
- I am loath to put library scripts into categories with built in functions. Since we are considering a pseudo-namespace specific to LSL (ie, LSL:) why not LSL Library: be considered? I seem to be less loath to having it included library scripts in categories with functions as a pseudo-namespace with a ":" then a " ". ":" provides a better separator. Strife Onizuka 08:30, 13 February 2007 (PST)