Difference between revisions of "Talk:N2K"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Kira Komarov (talk | contribs) |
Kira Komarov (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
[[User:Innula Zenovka|Innula Zenovka]] 08:50, 22 November 2011 (PST) | [[User:Innula Zenovka|Innula Zenovka]] 08:50, 22 November 2011 (PST) | ||
No problem. Yes, very true. "new members" *do* have second names. It's just that they are all "Resident". | No problem. Yes, very true. "new members" *do* have second names. It's just that they are all "Resident". In fact, if you pass the _full name_ to the script (including the "Resident" last name), it would work out of the box. Added a note, ty. | ||
Kira Komarov 08:47, 23 November 2011 (PST) | Kira Komarov 08:47, 23 November 2011 (PST) |
Revision as of 08:49, 23 November 2011
Needs "Resident" as a last name for newer names?
Thanks so much. This is a great help.
However, the only way I could get it to work for my newer alts (that is, ones with only one name) was to change it to <lsl> default {
link_message(integer sender_num, integer num, string str, key id) { lReqNum = sender_num; if(llGetListLength(llParseString2List(str,[" "],[""]))==1){//test for legacy name or new one str+=" Resident";//if it's a new name } // llOwnerSay(str); kReq = str; state kn2k; }
} </lsl> Innula Zenovka 08:50, 22 November 2011 (PST)
No problem. Yes, very true. "new members" *do* have second names. It's just that they are all "Resident". In fact, if you pass the _full name_ to the script (including the "Resident" last name), it would work out of the box. Added a note, ty.
Kira Komarov 08:47, 23 November 2011 (PST)