Difference between revisions of "Talk:Phantom Child"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Awesome script. Still works as of 9/25/2008. And you can even set the object as physical! (Change the 'flexible-set' by a 'physical-set') | Awesome script. Still works as of 9/25/2008. And you can even set the object as physical! (Change the 'flexible-set' by a 'physical-set'){{unsigned|Protector Cone|16:46, 26 September 2008}} | ||
== Bug Fix == | == Bug Fix == |
Revision as of 08:27, 28 October 2008
Awesome script. Still works as of 9/25/2008. And you can even set the object as physical! (Change the 'flexible-set' by a 'physical-set')—The preceding unsigned comment was added on 16:46, 26 September 2008 by Protector Cone
Bug Fix
Since this is an exploit of a current bug (jiralink?), would it be possible to estimate how the item reacts once the bug is fixed? Which would be the expected behaviour?
- Script silently fails, child and object staying solid?
- Script shouts an error on debug channel, child and object staying solid?
- Script works, child and object turning phantom?
I'm currently thinking about using it for a friends product but am afraid of the consequences... Others might be too. So it would be noteworthy in the article.
Greetz, Lynch (talk|contribs) 15:26, 28 October 2008 (UTC)